UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 2.274

Sortiert nach

Editorial: Systemic racism and creative emotion-Back to basics; Peer review-Institutional hypocrisy and author ambivalence; A modest proposal on Zoom teaching; In this issue

International journal of constitutional law, 2020-10, Vol.18 (3), p.673

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Is the future of peer review automated?

BMC research notes, 2022-06, Vol.15 (1), p.203-203, Article 203

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

NIH goes back to college for peer review

Nature medicine, 2010-02, Vol.16 (2), p.143-143

Dolgin, Elie

2010

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process

BMC research notes, 2022-04, Vol.15 (1), p.127-127, Article 127

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Perfecting peer review?

Nature medicine, 2011-01, Vol.17 (1), p.1-2

2011

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Priming and Prejudice: The Bias Effect of Origin Information on Peer Review, Judgment and Evaluation

Avances en psicología latinoamericana, 2019-01, Vol.37 (1), p.169-178

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Licensing the future: report on BioMed Central’s public consultation on open data in peer-reviewed journals

BMC research notes, 2013-08, Vol.6 (1), p.318-318, Article 318

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Conflict of Interest, Journal Review, and Publication Policy

Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.), 2008-12, Vol.33 (13), p.3023-3026

2008

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer-review court battle averted

Nature medicine, 1996-12, Vol.2 (12), p.1292-1292

Steele, Fintan R

1996

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium

Neural development, 2009-03, Vol.4 (1), p.10-10

2009

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A new oversight for peer review

Nature medicine, 1995-06, Vol.1 (6), p.498-498

Gavaghan, Helen

1995

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peering into review

Nature medicine, 2010-03, Vol.16 (3), p.239-239

2010

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Mostly, your results matter to others

Nature genetics, 2009-02, Vol.41 (2), p.135-135

2009

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

AdViSHE: A Validation-Assessment Tool of Health-Economic Models for Decision Makers and Model Users

PharmacoEconomics, 2016-04, Vol.34 (4), p.349-361

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A metareview at the NIH

Nature medicine, 2008-04, Vol.14 (4), p.351-351

2008

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Retraction Note to: Diagnosis, classification and grading of canine mammary tumours as a model to study human breast cancer: an Clinico-Cytohistopathological study with environmental factors influencing public health and medicine

Cancer cell international, 2016, Vol.16 (1), p.83-83, Article 83

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses

Nature genetics, 2009-02, Vol.41 (2), p.149-155

2009

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Trinity review: integrating Registered Reports with research ethics and funding reviews

BMC research notes, 2022-05, Vol.15 (1), p.184-184, Article 184

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Rethinking workplace collaboration – an old topic with a practical view

Management decision, 2023-11, Vol.61 (12), p.3637-3643

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Plagiarize or perish?

Nature medicine, 2006-05, Vol.12 (5), p.494-494

Ready, Tinker

2006

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Identifying spin bias of nonsignificant findings in biomedical studies

BMC research notes, 2023-05, Vol.16 (1), p.50-4, Article 50

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The Hundred Years War started today: an exploration of electronic peer review

Management decision, 1996-02, Vol.34 (1), p.54-59

Peters, John

1996

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

UK autism fracas fuels calls for peer review reform

Nature medicine, 2004-04, Vol.10 (4), p.321-321

Spinney, Laura

2004

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM)

Nature biotechnology, 2005-12, Vol.23 (12), p.1509-1515

2005

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Systematic reviews and cancer research: a suggested stepwise approach

BMC cancer, 2018-03, Vol.18 (1), p.246-246, Article 246

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

1 – 25 von 2.274

Suche als RSS-Feed

Aktive Filter

KollektionNexis Uni

KollektionIngentaConnect Journals

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(2.250)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(2.243)

Publikationsform

Artikel
(2.268)
Reviews
(6)

Sprache

Englisch
(2.250)
Japanisch
(172)
Spanisch
(30)
Portugiesisch
(9)

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Kollektion

Ingenta
(2.225)
EZB Free E-Journals
(1.084)
SpringerLink_现刊
(1.009)
Emerald Management 200
(504)
Nature International Weekly Journal of Science
(274)
Taylor & Francis Current Content Access
(258)
Publisher site
(236)
Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
(231)
EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate
(127)
Lippincott E Journal Collection
(121)
Factiva
(103)
Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
(75)
Jstor Complete Legacy
(73)
PAIS Index
(57)
Sociological Abstracts
(56)
Cambridge Journals Online (DEFF)
(48)
EBSCOhost Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
(38)
Wiley-Blackwell Journals
(34)

13 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

Management Decision
(452)
Bmc Cancer
(364)
Bmc Research Notes
(309)
Nature Medicine
(112)
Bmc Medical Genomics
(71)
Neuropsychopharmacology
(61)
Nature Genetics
(54)
Journal Of Property Investment & Finance
(52)
Journal Of Public Relations Research
(50)
Communication Law And Policy
(44)

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Neu hinzugefügt

... seit 30 Tagen
(1)
... seit 90 Tagen
(6)

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Editorial: Systemic racism and creative emotion-Back to basics; Peer review-Institutional hypocrisy and author ambivalence; A modest proposal on Zoom teaching; In this issue

Is the future of peer review automated?

NIH goes back to college for peer review

Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process

Perfecting peer review?

Priming and Prejudice: The Bias Effect of Origin Information on Peer Review, Judgment and Evaluation

Licensing the future: report on BioMed Central’s public consultation on open data in peer-reviewed journals

Conflict of Interest, Journal Review, and Publication Policy

Peer-review court battle averted

The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium

A new oversight for peer review

Peering into review

Mostly, your results matter to others

AdViSHE: A Validation-Assessment Tool of Health-Economic Models for Decision Makers and Model Users

A metareview at the NIH

Retraction Note to: Diagnosis, classification and grading of canine mammary tumours as a model to study human breast cancer: an Clinico-Cytohistopathological study with environmental factors influencing public health and medicine

Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses

Trinity review: integrating Registered Reports with research ethics and funding reviews

Rethinking workplace collaboration – an old topic with a practical view

Plagiarize or perish?

Identifying spin bias of nonsignificant findings in biomedical studies

The Hundred Years War started today: an exploration of electronic peer review

UK autism fracas fuels calls for peer review reform

Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM)

Systematic reviews and cancer research: a suggested stepwise approach

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern