UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 64

Sortiert nach

Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy

Energy Policy, 2012-06, Vol.45 (5), p.18-23

2012

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Why Do Countries Regulate Environmental Health Risks Differently? A Theoretical Perspective

Risk analysis, 2019-02, Vol.39 (2), p.439-461

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Analysis of different preferences for the EU's regulatory options for endocrine disruptor identification criteria using argumentation theory

The Science of the total environment, 2020-10, Vol.740, p.140076-140076, Article 140076

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Opinion of the Scientific Committee on health, environmental and emerging risks on the safety of titanium dioxide in toys

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2024-01, Vol.146, p.105527-105527, Article 105527

2024

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Framework for developing an exposure science curriculum as part of the European Exposure Science Strategy 2020–2030

Environment international, 2022-10, Vol.168, p.107477, Article 107477

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Building a European exposure science strategy

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2020-11, Vol.30 (6), p.917-924

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Conducting evaluations of evidence that are transparent, timely and can lead to health-protective actions

Environmental health, 2022-12, Vol.21 (1), p.123-23, Article 123

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Understanding conflicting views of endocrine disruptor experts: a pilot study using argumentation analysis

Journal of risk research, 2020-01, Vol.23 (1), p.62-80

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Comparison of chemical-induced transcriptional activation of fish and human estrogen receptors: Regulatory implications

Toxicology letters, 2011-03, Vol.201 (2), p.152-175

2011

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Reproductive toxicants have a threshold of adversity

Critical reviews in toxicology, 2011-07, Vol.41 (6), p.545-554

2011

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Occupational exposure to Cr(VI) in Finland in 1980–2016 and related lung cancer risk assessment

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2022-12, Vol.136, p.105276-105276, Article 105276

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Verification of a REACH Environmental Prioritization System Against Regulatory Risk Indices

Human and ecological risk assessment, 2013-07, Vol.19 (4), p.1049-1066

2013

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment of Synthetic Biology

Trends in biotechnology (Regular ed.), 2016-08, Vol.34 (8), p.601-603

2016

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Final opinion on the safety of breast implants in relation to anaplastic large cell lymphoma: Report of the scientific committee on health, emerging and environmental risks (SCHEER)

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2021-10, Vol.125, p.104982, Article 104982

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Human biomonitoring in health risk assessment in Europe: Current practices and recommendations for the future

International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2019-06, Vol.222 (5), p.727-737

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Is the EU chemicals strategy for sustainability a green deal?

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2023-03, Vol.139, p.105356-105356, Article 105356

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Opportunities for a probabilistic risk assessment of chemicals in the European Union

Chemosphere (Oxford), 2001-04, Vol.43 (2), p.257-264

2001

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Probabilistic risk characterization: An example with di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2005-10, Vol.43 (1), p.104-113

2005

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

An Opinion on non-human primates testing in Europe

Drug discovery today. Disease models, 2017, Vol.23, p.5-9

2017

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Scientific governance and the process for exposure scenario development in REACH

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2007-12, Vol.17 Suppl 1 (S1), p.S34-S37

2007

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Advice to the European Commission as Regards Type and Criteria for Comprehensive Studies to Be Requested From Manufacturers: The Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental, and Emerging Risks (SCHEER)

Nicotine & tobacco research, 2020-04, Vol.22 (5), p.613-618

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Recommendations to the European Commission implementing a priority list of additives that should have more stringent reporting requirements: the opinion of the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR)

Tobacco control, 2018-03, Vol.27 (2), p.225

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Enhancing the use of exposure science across EU chemical policies as part of the European Exposure Science Strategy 2020–2030

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2022-07, Vol.32 (4), p.513-525

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Towards further harmonization of a glossary for exposure science—an ISES Europe statement

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2022-07, Vol.32 (4), p.526-529

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

The Exposure Scenario Generator

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2006-11, Vol.17 (Suppl), p.S66

Vermeire, Theo

2006

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

1 – 25 von 64

Suche als RSS-Feed

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(64)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(62)

Publikationsform

Artikel
(64)

Sprache

Englisch
(64)
Japanisch
(3)

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Life Sciences & Biomedicine
(51)
Science & Technology
(51)
Risk Assessment
(32)
Toxicology
(27)
Environmental Sciences
(23)
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
(22)
Humans
(22)
Animals
(14)
Biological And Medical Sciences
(13)
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
(12)
Medical Sciences
(11)
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
(11)
Biodiversity & Conservation
(9)
Biodiversity Conservation
(9)
Chemicals
(8)
Legal Medicine
(8)
Medicine, Legal
(8)
Reach
(8)
Risk Management
(8)
No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level
(7)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy

Why Do Countries Regulate Environmental Health Risks Differently? A Theoretical Perspective

Analysis of different preferences for the EU's regulatory options for endocrine disruptor identification criteria using argumentation theory

Opinion of the Scientific Committee on health, environmental and emerging risks on the safety of titanium dioxide in toys

Framework for developing an exposure science curriculum as part of the European Exposure Science Strategy 2020–2030

Building a European exposure science strategy

Conducting evaluations of evidence that are transparent, timely and can lead to health-protective actions

Understanding conflicting views of endocrine disruptor experts: a pilot study using argumentation analysis

Comparison of chemical-induced transcriptional activation of fish and human estrogen receptors: Regulatory implications

Reproductive toxicants have a threshold of adversity

Occupational exposure to Cr(VI) in Finland in 1980–2016 and related lung cancer risk assessment

Verification of a REACH Environmental Prioritization System Against Regulatory Risk Indices

Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment of Synthetic Biology

Final opinion on the safety of breast implants in relation to anaplastic large cell lymphoma: Report of the scientific committee on health, emerging and environmental risks (SCHEER)

Human biomonitoring in health risk assessment in Europe: Current practices and recommendations for the future

Is the EU chemicals strategy for sustainability a green deal?

Opportunities for a probabilistic risk assessment of chemicals in the European Union

Probabilistic risk characterization: An example with di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

An Opinion on non-human primates testing in Europe

Scientific governance and the process for exposure scenario development in REACH

Advice to the European Commission as Regards Type and Criteria for Comprehensive Studies to Be Requested From Manufacturers: The Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental, and Emerging Risks (SCHEER)

Recommendations to the European Commission implementing a priority list of additives that should have more stringent reporting requirements: the opinion of the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR)

Enhancing the use of exposure science across EU chemical policies as part of the European Exposure Science Strategy 2020–2030

Towards further harmonization of a glossary for exposure science—an ISES Europe statement

The Exposure Scenario Generator

Suchergebnisse filtern