Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Barrientos, Alejandro
• Holdship, Jonathan
• Solar, Mauricio
• Martín, Sergio
• Rivilla, Víctor M.
• Viti, Serena
• Mangum, Jeff
• Harada, Nanase
• Sakamoto, Kazushi
• Muller, Sébastien
• Tanaka, Kunihiko
• Yoshimura, Yuki
• Nakanishi, Kouichiro
• Herrero-Illana, Rubén
• Mühle, Stefanie
• Aladro, Rebeca
• Aalto, Susanne
• Henkel, Christian
• Humire, Pedro

Titel

Towards the prediction of molecular parameters from astronomical emission lines using Neural Networks

Ist Teil von

• Experimental astronomy, 2021-10, Vol.52 (1-2), p.157-182

Ort / Verlag

Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands

Erscheinungsjahr

2021

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Molecular astronomy is a field that is blooming in the era of large observatories such as the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA). With modern, sensitive, and high spectral resolution radio telescopes like ALMA and the Square Kilometer Array, the size of the data cubes is rapidly escalating, generating a need for powerful automatic analysis tools. This work introduces MolPred , a pilot study to perform predictions of molecular parameters such as excitation temperature (T ex ) and column density ( l o g ( N )) from input spectra by the use of neural networks. We used as test cases the spectra of CO, HCO + , SiO and CH 3 CN between 80 and 400 GHz. Training spectra were generated with MADCUBA, a state-of-the-art spectral analysis tool. Our algorithm was designed to allow the generation of predictions for multiple molecules in parallel. Using neural networks, we can predict the column density and excitation temperature of these molecules with a mean absolute error of 8.5% for CO, 4.1% for HCO + , 1.5% for SiO and 1.6% for CH 3 CN. The prediction accuracy depends on the noise level, line saturation, and number of transitions. We performed predictions upon real ALMA data. The values predicted by our neural network for this real data differ by 13% from the MADCUBA values on average. Current limitations of our tool include not considering linewidth, source size, multiple velocity components, and line blending.