Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Haq, Fitash Ul
• Shin, Donghwan
• Nejati, Shiva
• Briand, Lionel

Titel

Can Offline Testing of Deep Neural Networks Replace Their Online Testing?: A Case Study of Automated Driving Systems

Ist Teil von

• Empirical software engineering : an international journal, 2021-09, Vol.26 (5), p.90-90, Article 90

Ort / Verlag

New York: Springer US

Erscheinungsjahr

2021

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

SpringerLink (Online service)

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• We distinguish two general modes of testing for Deep Neural Networks (DNNs): Offline testing where DNNs are tested as individual units based on test datasets obtained without involving the DNNs under test, and online testing where DNNs are embedded into a specific application environment and tested in a closed-loop mode in interaction with the application environment. Typically, DNNs are subjected to both types of testing during their development life cycle where offline testing is applied immediately after DNN training and online testing follows after offline testing and once a DNN is deployed within a specific application environment. In this paper, we study the relationship between offline and online testing. Our goal is to determine how offline testing and online testing differ or complement one another and if offline testing results can be used to help reduce the cost of online testing? Though these questions are generally relevant to all autonomous systems, we study them in the context of automated driving systems where, as study subjects, we use DNNs automating end-to-end controls of steering functions of self-driving vehicles. Our results show that offline testing is less effective than online testing as many safety violations identified by online testing could not be identified by offline testing, while large prediction errors generated by offline testing always led to severe safety violations detectable by online testing. Further, we cannot exploit offline testing results to reduce the cost of online testing in practice since we are not able to identify specific situations where offline testing could be as accurate as online testing in identifying safety requirement violations.