Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Silva, Valéria O.
• Yamashiro, Rosemeire
• Ahagon, Cintia M.
• Campos, Ivana B.
• de Oliveira, Isabela P.
• de Oliveira, Elaine L.
• López‐Lopes, Giselle I. S.
• Matsuda, Elaine M.
• Castejon, Marcia J.
• de Macedo Brígido, Luís F.

Titel

Inhibition of receptor‐binding domain—ACE2 interaction after two doses of Sinovac's CoronaVac or AstraZeneca/Oxford's AZD1222 SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines

Ist Teil von

• Journal of medical virology, 2022-03, Vol.94 (3), p.1217-1223

Ort / Verlag

United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Quelle

Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Practical laboratory proxies that correlate to vaccine efficacy may facilitate trials, identify nonresponders, and inform about boosting strategies. Among clinical and laboratory markers, assays that evaluate antibodies that inhibit receptor‐binding domain (RBD) ligation to angiotensin‐converting enzyme‐2 receptor (receptor‐binding inhibition [RBI]) may provide a surrogate for viral neutralization assays. We evaluated RBI before and after a median of 34 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 33–40) of the second dose of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) Sinovac's CoronaVac (CN) or AstraZeneca/Oxford's AZD1222 (AZ) vaccines in 166 individuals. Both vaccines elicited high inhibitory titers in most subjects, 95% (158/166), with signal inhibition above 30% and 89% (127/143) with more than fourfold increase from prevaccination titers, but titers tend to decrease over time. Both postvaccination inhibitory titers (95%, IQR 85%–97% for AZ vs. 79%, IQR 60%–96% for CN, p = 0.004) and pre/post‐titer increase (AZ 76%, IQR 51%–86% for AZ vs. 47%, IQR 24%–67% for CN, p < 0.0001) were higher among AZ vaccinees. Previous serological reactivity due to natural infection was associated with high prevaccination signal inhibition titers. The study documents a robust antibody response capable of interfering with RBD–angiotensin‐converting enzyme binding. Evaluation of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection incidence in these populations is necessary to assess its association to protection and its duration.