Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 21 von 70

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Early CPAP versus Surfactant in Extremely Preterm Infants
Ist Teil von
  • The New England journal of medicine, 2010-05, Vol.362 (21), p.1970-1979
Ort / Verlag
Waltham, MA: Massachusetts Medical Society
Erscheinungsjahr
2010
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Alma/SFX Local Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • In this part of a randomized, 2-by-2 factorial trial involving extremely preterm infants, use of intubation and surfactant treatment (within 1 hour after birth) was compared with initiation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the delivery room and subsequent use of a protocol-driven limited ventilation strategy. The rate of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (the primary outcome) did not differ significantly between the groups; the CPAP group required intubation less frequently and for fewer days than did the surfactant group. These results support consideration of CPAP as an alternative to intubation and surfactant in preterm infants. Use of intubation and surfactant treatment was compared with initiation of CPAP in the delivery room. The rate of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia did not differ significantly between the groups. The CPAP group required intubation less frequently and for fewer days than did the surfactant group. It has been shown that surfactant treatment at less than 2 hours of life significantly decreases the rates of death, air leak, and death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. 1 , 2 Overall, prophylactic treatment with surfactant has not been shown to significantly reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia alone, whereas studies comparing early with later rescue use of surfactant have shown that there is a decreased risk of chronic lung disease with early use. 2 Several studies have shown that the use of surfactant does not have a significant effect on the risk of subsequent neurodevelopmental impairment, 3 although a recent follow-up . . .

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX