Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 20 von 65

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade and use of neuromuscular blocking agents with or without antagonists: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2020-09, Vol.64, p.109818-109818, Article 109818
Ort / Verlag
United States: Elsevier Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) have revolutionized the field of anesthesiology as they facilitate airway management and ensure optimal surgical conditions. Despite their beneficial and ubiquitous use during surgery, delayed or partial recovery from NMBAs, referred to as residual neuromuscular block (rNMB), is a common clinical problem. While it is well accepted that the antagonist sugammadex, compared to neostigmine, can more rapidly reverse rocuronium-induced NMB regardless of depth of block, the occurrence of rNMB for routinely used combinations of NMBAs with sugammadex or neostigmine has not yet been quantified or evaluated systematically. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to quantify and compare the incidence of rNMB [defined as train-of-four ratio (TOFR) <0.9] in patients with moderate and deep neuromuscular block. Methods recommended by Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA group were followed. A total of 35 RCTs were identified, of which 20 contributed to the meta-analysis. For moderate block, rNMB incidence at 2 min after sugammadex administration was 19.2% (95% CI 0.0–57.8; 122 patients) and declined to 2.8% (95% CI 0.0–16.7; 93 patients) at 6 min post administration. For timepoints 10 to 60 min after administration, rNMB incidence ranged between 0.05% to 2.8%. In contrast, rNMB incidence at 2 min after neostigmine administration was 100% (95% CI 89.9–100; 182 patients) and was 82% (95% CI 71.4–91.2; 93 patients) at 6 min post administration. For timepoints 10 to 60 min after administration, rNMB incidence ranged between 14 and 32%. For deep block, rNMB incidence following sugammadex was essentially reduced to 1% at 15 min after administration. Residual NMB incidence following neostigmine remained at or above 95% for the first 60 min after administration. Overall, based on evidence from 20 RCTs, our results suggest that the combination of rocuronium or vecuronium plus sugammadex is more effective and more rapid in reversing NMB compared with combinations of rocuronium, vecuronium, cisatracurium, or pancuronium plus neostigmine. •Residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) is an undesired event and is associated with poor post-operative outcomes•The combination of rocuronium or vecuronium plus sugammadex had the lowest incidence of rNMB in moderate and deep block•Reversal of rocuronium or vecuronium by sugammadex is more rapid and effective than reversal with neostigmine
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0952-8180
eISSN: 1873-4529
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109818
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2391976164

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX