Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Mengual, Ximo
• Kerr, Peter
• Norrbom, Allen L.
• Barr, Norman B.
• Lewis, Matthew L.
• Stapelfeldt, Anna M.
• Scheffer, Sonja J.
• Woods, Patrick
• Islam, Md-Sajedul
• Korytkowski, Cheslavo A.
• Uramoto, Keiko
• Rodriguez, Erick J.
• Sutton, Bruce D.
• Nolazco, Norma
• Steck, Gary J.
• Gaimari, Stephen

Titel

Phylogenetic relationships of the tribe Toxotrypanini (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on molecular characters

Ist Teil von

• Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 2017-08, Vol.113, p.84-112

Ort / Verlag

United States: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2017

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• [Display omitted] •Tribe Toxotrypanini is non-monophyletic and Hexachaeta is not related to Anastrepha.•Genera Anastrepha and Toxotrypana should be considered synonyms.•Anastrepha, including Toxotrypana, is well-supported by molecular evidence.•Present results support most of the studied Anastrepha species groups. Current hypotheses of relationship among the species of the fruit fly genera Anastrepha and Toxotrypana are tested using sequence data from six DNA regions: the mitochondrial regions 16S, CAD, and COI, and the nuclear regions EF1a, PER, and PGD. DNA sequences were obtained from 146 species of Anastrepha, representing 19 of the 21 species groups as well as five of the six clades of the robusta group, and four species of Toxotrypana in addition to species of Hexachaeta, Pseudophorellia, Alujamyia, and 13 other tephritid genera used as outgroups. The results indicate that Hexachaeta is more closely related to the Molynocoelia group than to Toxotrypana and Anastrepha, and it is removed from the tribe Toxotrypanini. The group Anastrepha+Toxotrypana and the genus Toxotrypana are strongly supported as monophyletic, consistent with previous studies, but Toxotrypana arises within Anastrepha, confirming that Anastrepha as currently defined is paraphyletic. The placement of Toxotrypana within Anastrepha is clearly defined for the first time with high support, as the sister group to the cryptostrepha clade of the robusta group of Anastrepha. Within Anastrepha, the daciformis, dentata, leptozona, raveni, and striata species groups are highly supported clades. The serpentina group is recognized with lower support, and the fraterculus and pseudoparallela groups are supported with minor alterations. The robusta group is resolved as polyphyletic, but four of the six species clades within it are recovered monophyletic (one clade is not represented and another is represented by one species). The punctata and panamensis groups are resolved together in a clade. At least some species of the mucronota group are related, however this group requires further study. The benjamini, grandis, and spatulata groups appear to be polyphyletic. Relationships among the species groups are generally poorly resolved, with the following exceptions: (1) the lineage including Toxotrypana, the cryptostrepha clade, and the tripunctata group; (2) the sister group relationship of the daciformis+dentata groups; (3) a clade comprising the punctata and panamensis groups; and (4) the large clade comprising the pseudoparallela+spatulata+ramosa+grandis+serpentina+striata+fraterculus groups.