Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
RAWLS AND GLOBAL JUSTICE: A DISPUTE OVER A KANTIAN LEGACY
Ist Teil von
The Philosophical forum, 2012-09, Vol.43 (3), p.297-309
Ort / Verlag
Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2012
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
Beschreibungen/Notizen
In the controversy over Rawls and global justice, his fiercest critics are cosmopolitans of equality, who claim that the Standard Case requires a global extension of both the domestic original position and the demanding political duties to reduce inequality of opportunity and promote material expectations of the worst-off that it supports. Miller argues that they are wrong, that Rawls' explicit refusal to extrapolate was coherent, but that their challenge illuminates the central role in the domestic account of certain fundamental interests, ingredients in the original position which Rawls seems to associate with the "true human needs" to which Kant refers in the Metaphysics of Morals