Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Gould, K. Lance, MD
• Johnson, Nils P., MD, MS
• Bateman, Timothy M., MD
• Beanlands, Rob S., MD
• Bengel, Frank M., MD
• Bober, Robert, MD
• Camici, Paolo G., MD
• Cerqueira, Manuel D., MD
• Chow, Benjamin J.W., MD
• Di Carli, Marcelo F., MD
• Dorbala, Sharmila, MD, MPH
• Gewirtz, Henry, MD
• Gropler, Robert J., MD
• Kaufmann, Philipp A., MD
• Knaapen, Paul, MD, PhD
• Knuuti, Juhani, MD, PhD
• Merhige, Michael E., MD
• Rentrop, K. Peter, MD
• Ruddy, Terrence D., MD
• Schelbert, Heinrich R., MD, PhD
• Schindler, Thomas H., MD
• Schwaiger, Markus, MD
• Sdringola, Stefano, MD
• Vitarello, John, MD
• Williams, Kim A., MD
• Gordon, Donald, MD
• Dilsizian, Vasken, MD
• Narula, Jagat, MD, PhD

Titel

Anatomic Versus Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease

Ist Teil von

• Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013-10, Vol.62 (18), p.1639-1653

Ort / Verlag

New York: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2013

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

EZB Electronic Journals Library

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the primary guide to revascularization or medical management of coronary artery disease. However, physiologic severity defined by coronary pressure and/or flow has resurged into clinical prominence as a potential, fundamental change from anatomically to physiologically guided management. This review addresses clinical coronary physiology—pressure and flow—as clinical tools for treating patients. We clarify the basic concepts that hold true for whatever technology measures coronary physiology directly and reliably, here focusing on positron emission tomography and its interplay with intracoronary measurements.