Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 18 von 1076

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
The patient's perspective on radiation for rectal cancer: Initial expectations versus actual experience
Ist Teil von
  • Cancer medicine (Malden, MA), 2023-10, Vol.12 (19), p.19978-19986
Ort / Verlag
United States: John Wiley and Sons Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2023
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Wiley Online Library (Online service)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • The aim of this study was to compare patient perceptions of radiotherapy (RT) before and after treatment to better inform future patients and providers. Seventy-eight consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neo- or adjuvant chemoradiation, surgical resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy from 2009 to 2018 and who were without recurrence were included. Patients were surveyed ≥6 months after ileostomy reversal or ≥3 months after adjuvant chemotherapy. The survey assessed patients' baseline knowledge and fears of RT, how their short- and long-term side effects compared with initial expectations, and how their experiences compared for each modality (RT, surgery, and chemotherapy). Forty patient-responses were received. Before treatment, 70% of patients indicated little to no knowledge of RT, though 43% reported hearing frightening stories about RT. The most commonly top-ranked fears included organ damage (26%), skin burns (14%), and inability to carry out normal daily activities (10%). Eighty percent reported short-term effects of RT to be less than or as expected, with urinary changes (93%), abdominal discomfort (90%), and anxiety (88%) most commonly rated as less than or as expected. 85% reported long-term effects to be less than or as expected, with pain (95%), changes to the appearance of the treated area (85%), and dissatisfaction with body image (80%) most commonly rated as less than or as expected. Surgery was most commonly rated as the most difficult treatment (50%) and most responsible for long-term effects (55%). RT was least commonly rated as the most difficult treatment (13%), and chemotherapy was least commonly rated as most responsible for long-term effects (13%). The majority of patients indicated short- and long-term side effects of RT for rectal cancer to be better than initial expectations. In the context of trimodality therapy, patients reported RT to be the least difficult of the treatments.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 2045-7634
eISSN: 2045-7634
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6541
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5f4f019916b94608bf530c6bc25f4bf7

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX