Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 18 von 36206
Film-philosophy, 2020-06, Vol.24 (2), p.162-184
2020

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Aesthetic Puzzlements: Jonas Mekas's Diary Films and Ludwig Wittgenstein
Ist Teil von
  • Film-philosophy, 2020-06, Vol.24 (2), p.162-184
Ort / Verlag
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • In this article, I argue that by considering Ludwig Wittgenstein's methods, we can better understand and appreciate Jonas Mekas's diary films. Based on Wittgenstein's notion of “aesthetic puzzlement”, I identify the main confusions encountered by the viewer upon watching Mekas's films, such as: 1) fragmentation; 2) persistent repetition; and 3) the importance placed on the everyday. I discuss three films –  Walden (1969), Lost Lost Lost (1976), and As I Was Moving Ahead Occasionally I Saw Brief Glimpses of Beauty (2000) – and demonstrate that the aesthetic puzzlements within them may be dissolved by looking at the format of Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations (1953). Mekas's lifelong interest in filming the most mundane and domestic scenes can be understood as a puzzlement in itself: why not just admire the ordinary whilst living in it? Wittgenstein's thought experiment in Culture and Value helps us understand the aesthetic puzzlement of Mekas's interest in filming, remembering and presenting an extensive array of everyday activities, and also explains why the viewer can find the most mundane and domestic activities in his films remarkable. Additionally, I discuss how Mekas's diary films may be regarded as coming close to Wittgenstein's aesthetic ideal of art as being able to represent “life itself”. I aim to show how Mekas's cinematic practice places extreme importance on ordinary acts and offers a mode of thinking which echoes Wittgenstein's own views on philosophy. I conclude with a discussion of “nomadism”, a notion that elucidates the peculiar form of the works of both Wittgenstein and Mekas.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1466-4615
eISSN: 1466-4615
DOI: 10.3366/film.2020.0137
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_45edf7bf81634596bdd234b59debaa92

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX