Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Schroé, Helene
• Crombez, Geert
• De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
• Van Dyck, Delfien

Titel

Investigating When, Which, and Why Users Stop Using a Digital Health Intervention to Promote an Active Lifestyle: Secondary Analysis With A Focus on Health Action Process Approach-Based Psychological Determinants

Ist Teil von

• JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2022-01, Vol.10 (1), p.e30583

Ort / Verlag

Canada: JMIR Publications

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Digital health interventions have gained momentum to change health behaviors such as physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB). Although these interventions show promising results in terms of behavior change, they still suffer from high attrition rates, resulting in a lower potential and accessibility. To reduce attrition rates in the future, there is a need to investigate the reasons why individuals stop using the interventions. Certain demographic variables have already been related to attrition; however, the role of psychological determinants of behavior change as predictors of attrition has not yet been fully explored. The aim of this study was to examine when, which, and why users stopped using a digital health intervention. In particular, we aimed to investigate whether psychological determinants of behavior change were predictors for attrition. The sample consisted of 473 healthy adults who participated in the intervention MyPlan 2.0 to promote PA or reduce SB. The intervention was developed using the health action process approach (HAPA) model, which describes psychological determinants that guide individuals in changing their behavior. If participants stopped with the intervention, a questionnaire with 8 question concerning attrition was sent by email. To analyze when users stopped using the intervention, descriptive statistics were used per part of the intervention (including pre- and posttest measurements and the 5 website sessions). To analyze which users stopped using the intervention, demographic variables, behavioral status, and HAPA-based psychological determinants at pretest measurement were investigated as potential predictors of attrition using logistic regression models. To analyze why users stopped using the intervention, descriptive statistics of scores to the attrition-related questionnaire were used. The study demonstrated that 47.9% (227/473) of participants stopped using the intervention, and drop out occurred mainly in the beginning of the intervention. The results seem to indicate that gender and participant scores on the psychological determinants action planning, coping planning, and self-monitoring were predictors of first session, third session, or whole intervention completion. The most endorsed reasons to stop using the intervention were the time-consuming nature of questionnaires (55%), not having time (50%), dissatisfaction with the content of the intervention (41%), technical problems (39%), already meeting the guidelines for PA/SB (31%), and, to a lesser extent, the experience of medical/emotional problems (16%). This study provides some directions for future studies. To decrease attrition, it will be important to personalize interventions on different levels, questionnaires (either for research purposes or tailoring) should be kept to a minimum especially in the beginning of interventions by, for example, using objective monitoring devices, and technical aspects of digital health interventions should be thoroughly tested in advance. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03274271; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03274271. RR2-10.1186/s13063-019-3456-7.