Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Information and software technology, 2019-08, Vol.112, p.35-47
Ort / Verlag
Elsevier B.V
Erscheinungsjahr
2019
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
Beschreibungen/Notizen
There has been a rapid growth in the use of data analytics to underpin evidence-based software engineering. However the combination of complex techniques, diverse reporting standards and poorly understood underlying phenomena are causing some concern as to the reliability of studies.
Our goal is to provide guidance for producers and consumers of software analytics studies (computational experiments and correlation studies).
We propose using “bad smells”, i.e., surface indications of deeper problems and popular in the agile software community and consider how they may be manifest in software analytics studies.
We list 12 “bad smells” in software analytics papers (and show their impact by examples).
We believe the metaphor of bad smell is a useful device. Therefore we encourage more debate on what contributes to the validity of software analytics studies (so we expect our list will mature over time).