UNIVERSI
TÄ
TS-
BIBLIOTHEK
P
ADERBORN
Anmelden
Menü
Menü
Start
Hilfe
Blog
Weitere Dienste
Neuerwerbungslisten
Fachsystematik Bücher
Erwerbungsvorschlag
Bestellung aus dem Magazin
Fernleihe
Einstellungen
Sprache
Deutsch
Deutsch
Englisch
Farbschema
Hell
Dunkel
Automatisch
Universitätsbibliothek
Katalog
Details
Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich.
mehr Informationen...
Datensatz exportieren als...
BibTeX
Evaluation of the Alphasense optical particle counter (OPC-N2) and the Grimm portable aerosol spectrometer (PAS-1.108)
Aerosol science and technology, 2016-01, Vol.50 (12), p.1352-1365
Sousan, Sinan
Koehler, Kirsten
Hallett, Laura
Peters, Thomas M.
2016
Details
Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Sousan, Sinan
Koehler, Kirsten
Hallett, Laura
Peters, Thomas M.
Titel
Evaluation of the Alphasense optical particle counter (OPC-N2) and the Grimm portable aerosol spectrometer (PAS-1.108)
Ist Teil von
Aerosol science and technology, 2016-01, Vol.50 (12), p.1352-1365
Ort / Verlag
United States: Taylor & Francis
Erscheinungsjahr
2016
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Alma/SFX Local Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
We compared the performance of a low-cost (∼$500), compact optical particle counter (OPC, OPC-N2, Alphasense) to another OPC (PAS-1.108, Grimm Technologies) and reference instruments. We measured the detection efficiency of the OPCs by size from 0.5 to 5 µm for monodispersed, polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres. We then compared number and mass concentrations measured with the OPCs to those measured with reference instruments for three aerosols: salt, welding fume, and Arizona road dust. The OPC-N2 detection efficiency was similar to the PAS-1.108 for particles larger than 0.8 µm (minimum of 79% at 1 µm and maximum of 101% at 3 µm). For 0.5-µm particles, the detection efficiency of the OPC-N2 was underestimated at 78%, whereas PAS-1.108 overestimated concentrations by 183%. The mass concentrations from the OPCs were linear (r ≥ 0.97) with those from the reference instruments for all aerosols, although the slope and intercept were different. The mass concentrations were overestimated for dust (OPC-N2, slope = 1.6; PAS-1.108, slope = 2.7) and underestimated for welding fume (OPC-N2, slope = 0.05; PAS-1.108, slope = 0.4). The coefficient of variation (CV, precision) for OPC-N2 for all experiments was between 4.2% and 16%. These findings suggest that, given site-specific calibrations, the OPC-N2 can provide number and mass concentrations similar to the PAS-1.108 for particles larger than 1 µm. Copyright © 2016 American Association for Aerosol Research
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0278-6826
eISSN: 1521-7388
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2016.1232859
Titel-ID: cdi_pubmed_primary_28871213
Format
–
Schlagworte
Aerosols
,
Atoms & subatomic particles
,
Dust
,
Efficiency
,
Jian Wang
Weiterführende Literatur
Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von
bX