Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Beeler Asay, Garrett R
• Lam, Chee Kin
• Stewart, Brock
• Mangan, Joan M
• Romo, Laura
• Marks, Suzanne M
• Morris, Sapna Bamrah
• Gummo, Caroline L
• Keh, Chris E
• Hill, Andrew N
• Thomas, Anila
• Macaraig, Michelle
• St John, Kristen
• J Ampie, Teresita
• Chuck, Christine
• Burzynski, Joseph

Titel

Cost of Tuberculosis Therapy Directly Observed on Video for Health Departments and Patients in New York City; San Francisco, California; and Rhode Island (2017-2018)

Ist Teil von

• American journal of public health (1971), 2020-11, Vol.110 (11), p.1696-1703

Ort / Verlag

United States: American Public Health Association

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

PAIS Index

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• To assess costs of video and traditional in-person directly observed therapy (DOT) for tuberculosis (TB) treatment to health departments and patients in New York City, Rhode Island, and San Francisco, California. We collected health department costs for video DOT (VDOT; live and recorded), and in-person DOT (field- and clinic-based). Time-motion surveys estimated provider time and cost. A separate survey collected patient costs. We used a regression model to estimate cost by DOT type. Between August 2017 and June 2018, 343 DOT sessions were captured from 225 patients; 87 completed a survey. Patient costs were lowest for VDOT live ($1.01) and highest for clinic DOT ($34.53). The societal (health department + patient) costs of VDOT live and recorded ($6.65 and $12.64, respectively) were less than field and clinic DOT ($21.40 and $46.11, respectively). VDOT recorded health department cost was not statistically different from field DOT cost in Rhode Island. Among the 4 different modalities, both types of VDOT were associated with lower societal costs when compared with traditional forms of DOT. VDOT was associated with lower costs from the societal perspective and may reduce public health costs when TB incidence is high.