Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Berberich, Anne
• Schmitt, Lara-Marie
• Pusch, Stefan
• Hielscher, Thomas
• Rübmann, Petra
• Hucke, Nanina
• Latzer, Pauline
• Heßling, Bernd
• Lemke, Dieter
• Kessler, Tobias
• Platten, Michael
• Wick, Wolfgang

Titel

cMyc and ERK activity are associated with resistance to ALK inhibitory treatment in glioblastoma

Ist Teil von

• Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020, Vol.146 (1), p.9-23

Ort / Verlag

New York: Springer US

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

SpringerLink (Online service)

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is expressed in ~ 60% of glioblastomas and conveys tumorigenic functions. Therefore, ALK inhibitory strategies with alectinib are conceivable for patients with glioblastoma. The aims of this preclinical study were to investigate efficacy as well as to understand and potentially overcome primary and acquired resistance mechanisms of alectinib in glioblastoma. Methods Efficacy of alectinib was analyzed dependent on ALK expression in different glioblastoma initiating cells and after lentiviral knockdown of ALK. Alectinib resistant cells were generated by continuous treatment with increasing alectinib doses over 3 months. M-RNA, phospho-protein and protein regulation were analyzed to decipher relevant pathways associated to treatment or resistance and specifically inhibited to evaluate rational salvage therapies. Results Alectinib reduced clonogenicity and proliferation and induced apoptosis in ALK expressing glioblastoma initiating cells, whereas cells without ALK expression or after ALK depletion via knockdown showed primary resistance against alectinib. High expression of cMyc and activation of the ERK1/2 pathway conferred resistance against alectinib in ALK expressing glioblastoma cells. Pharmacological inhibition of these pathways by cMyc inhibitor or MEK inhibitor, trametinib, overcame alectinib resistance and re-sensitized resistant cells to continued alectinib treatment. The combination of alectinib with radiotherapy demonstrated synergistic effects in inhibition of clonogenicity in non-resistant and alectinib resistant glioblastoma cells. Conclusion The data offer rationales for alectinib treatment in ALK expressing glioblastoma and for the use of ALK expression status as potential biomarker for alectinib treatment. In addition, the results propose MEK inhibition or radiotherapy as reasonable salvage treatments after acquired alectinib resistance.