Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
International journal of sports medicine, 2014-03, Vol.35 (3), p.209-216
2014
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Velocity- and Power-Load Relationships of the Bench Pull vs. Bench Press Exercises
Ist Teil von
  • International journal of sports medicine, 2014-03, Vol.35 (3), p.209-216
Ort / Verlag
Stuttgart · New York: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
Quelle
Thieme - Connect here FIRST to enable access
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Abstract This study compared the velocity- and power-load relationships of the antagonistic upper-body exercises of prone bench pull (PBP) and bench press (BP). 75 resistance-trained athletes performed a progressive loading test in each exercise up to the one-repetition maximum (1RM) in random order. Velocity and power output across the 30–100% 1RM were significantly higher for PBP, whereas 1RM strength was greater for BP. A very close relationship was observed between relative load and mean propulsive velocity for both BP (R 2 =0.97) and PBP (R 2 =0.94) which enables us to estimate %1RM from velocity using the obtained prediction equations. Important differences in the load that maximizes power output (P max ) and the power profiles of both exercises were found according to the outcome variable used: mean (MP), peak (PP) or mean propulsive power (MPP). When MP was considered, the P max load was higher (56% BP, 70% PBP) than when PP (37% BP, 41% PBP) or MPP (37% BP, 46% PBP) were used. For each variable there was a broad range of loads at which power output was not significantly different. The differing velocity- and power-load relationships between PBP and BP seem attributable to the distinct muscle architecture and moment arm levers involved in these exercises.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX