Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Did Russian Cyber Interference in the 2016 Election Violate International Law?
Ist Teil von
Texas law review, 2017-06, Vol.95 (7), p.1579-1598
Ort / Verlag
Austin: University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Nexis
Beschreibungen/Notizen
[...]Part III will offer a conceptual argument that seeks to recast the sovereignty argument with a new legal architecture built from the raw materials of self-determination.[...]this Article will assume that the attribution requirement is satisfied and that there is sufficient evidence to link the hacking with the Russian government.[...]in conducting the legal analysis, it is important to look at the entire event together rather than segmenting the Russian cyber interference into isolated behaviors.[...]this is a core difference between the sovereignty and self-determination frameworks; the concept of sovereignty leaves little room for discriminating between political arrangements. 74.[...]the Tallinn Manual concludes: [T]he matter most clearly within a State's domaine reserve appears to be the choice of both the political system and its organization, as these issues lie at the heart of sovereignty.[...]cyber means that are coercive in nature may not be used to alter or suborn modification of another State's government or social structure.