Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Castells-Sanabra, Marcella
• Borén, Clara
• van der Meer, Ruurd
• Torralbo, Jordi
• Ordás, Santiago

Titel

Existing Emission Calculation Methods Applied to Monitoring, Reporting and Verifi cation (MRV) on Board

Ist Teil von

• Naše more znanstveni časopis za more i pomorstvo, 2020-06, Vol.67 (2), p.163-171

Ort / Verlag

Dubrovnik: Sveuiliste u Dubrovniku

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

EZB Electronic Journals Library

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) of emissions on board has been proposed as a measure to reduce global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The requirements for MRV are set by two legislative bodies, the European Union (EU-MRV) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO-DCS) and ships have to comply with them. However, current maritime practices do not permit the right implementation of MRV and best practices can only be developed after a certain time of experience. A solution could be the application of the different existing emission calculation methods on the phase of MRV where it is most useful. This contribution explores which method could be useful as maritime best practices and could meet the goals of EU-MRV and IMO-DCS. Eleven existing methods have been assessed by a set of questions based on key MRV elements found in literature. Methods have been classified within Theoretical Based Methods (TBM) and Ship Based Methods (SBM). TBM methods may not comply with the monitoring phase of MRV but could be feasible as alternative method when activity data from ships are extracted. On the other hand, SBM methods seem to be the most appropriates to comply with MRV specifications, but need more investments on board and therefore require best practices regarding the way of application. The assessed methods are already available, possibly suitable to be used for monitoring, and therefore applicable as early best practices, with the understanding that some of the methods are theoretical, based on assumptions, and often too general. Nevertheless, a different approach like the one presented in this contribution may be supportive in the understanding of MRV on board.