Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistant Escherichia coli by Rectal Swab Method ―Annual Change of Prevalence of Quinolone-resistant and ESBL Producing Strains from 2009 to 2013
Ist Teil von
  • Kansenshogaku Zasshi, 2015/09/20, Vol.89(5), pp.583-587
Ort / Verlag
The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
EZB Free E-Journals
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Although most of commonly used antimicrobial agents had been susceptible to Esherichia coli, recently there are a lot of reports concerning about community-acquired infection caused by resistant E. coli.The aim of this study is to define the prevalence of resistant E. coli in normal flora colonization by the rectal swab method. From June 2009 to December 2013, 251 male patients (50~85 year-old, median 68) planned to transrectal prostate biopsy participated in this study. Stools stuck on the glove at the digital examination were provided for culture specimen. Identification of E. coli and determination of MIC was performed by MicroScan WalkAway40plus (Siemens). Isolated E. coli were deemed quinolone-resistant strains when their MIC of levofloxacine was 4μg/mL or above according to the breakpoint MIC by the CLSI criteria. ESBL producing ability was determined by the double disk method used by CVA contained ESBL definition disc (Eikenkagaku). Of the 251 study patients, 224 patients had positive cultures of E. coli. Twenty-four patients had quinolone-resistant strains and 9 patients had ESBL producing strains. The prevalence of quinolone-resistant strains in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 were 5.9%(2 out of 34 strains), 13.5%(5 out of 37 strains), 12.5%(4 out of 32 strains), 9.0%(6 out of 67) and 13.0%(7 out of 54 strains), respectively. The prevalence of ESBL producing strains in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 were 0%(0 out of 34 strains), 5.4%(2 out of 37 strains), 3.1%(1 out of 32 strains), 3.0%(2 out of 67 strains) and 7.4%(4 out of 54 strains), respectively. In 2013, the prevalence of antimicrobial resistant E. coli, both quinolone-resistant and ESBL producing strains, were increasing. We have to pay a close attention to the increase ofresistantE. coli. Although most of commonly used antimicrobial agents had been susceptible to Esherichia coli, recently there are a lot of reports concerning about community-acquired infection caused by resistant E. coli.The aim of this study is to define the prevalence of resistant E. coli in normal flora colonization by the rectal swab method. From June 2009 to December 2013, 251 male patients (50~85 year-old, median 68) planned to transrectal prostate biopsy participated in this study. Stools stuck on the glove at the digital examination were provided for culture specimen. Identification of E. coli and determination of MIC was performed by MicroScan WalkAway40plus (Siemens). Isolated E. coli were deemed quinolone-resistant strains when their MIC of levofloxacine was 4μg/mL or above according to the breakpoint MIC by the CLSI criteria. ESBL producing ability was determined by the double disk method used by CVA contained ESBL definition disc (Eikenkagaku). Of the 251 study patients, 224 patients had positive cultures of E. coli. Twenty-four patients had quinolone-resistant strains and 9 patients had ESBL producing strains. The prevalence of quinolone-resistant strains in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 were 5.9%(2 out of 34 strains), 13.5%(5 out of 37 strains), 12.5%(4 out of 32 strains), 9.0%(6 out of 67) and 13.0%(7 out of 54 strains), respectively. The prevalence of ESBL producing strains in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 were 0%(0 out of 34 strains), 5.4%(2 out of 37 strains), 3.1%(1 out of 32 strains), 3.0%(2 out of 67 strains) and 7.4%(4 out of 54 strains), respectively. In 2013, the prevalence of antimicrobial resistant E. coli, both quinolone-resistant and ESBL producing strains, were increasing. We have to pay a close attention to the increase ofresistant E. coli.
Sprache
Japanisch; Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0387-5911
eISSN: 1884-569X
DOI: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi.89.583
Titel-ID: cdi_crossref_primary_10_11150_kansenshogakuzasshi_89_583

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX