Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich.
mehr Informationen...
A framework for assessing fossil fuel ‘retrofit’ hydrogen exports: Security-justice implications of Australia’s coal-generated hydrogen exports to Japan
Ist Teil von
Energy (Oxford), 2021-05, Vol.223, p.119938, Article 119938
Ort / Verlag
Oxford: Elsevier Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2021
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
Beschreibungen/Notizen
This article addresses transnational ‘retrofit’ brown coal hydrogen generation energy systems. Retrofit energy supply-chains, from generation to end product, encompass fossil fuel energy generation with retrofitted carbon capture and storage (CCS), for clean energy [hydrogen] output. Three research questions are posited: can an energy security framework be identified for analysis of fossil fuel retrofit hydrogen exports; what findings arise from applying the framework to a case study of Australian exports of coal-generated hydrogen to Japan; and are such international energy systems compromised by sub-optimal carbon-emitting supply chains, with potential implications for global energy justice? A systematic literature review identified a modified framework, further developed in this article to catalyse global energy security-justice analysis; contributing a useful energy security-justice tool. Applying the framework, findings illustrate key opportunities in Australia/Japan’s energy diversification, supply security, and bilateral trade-strategic security relationships. Key risks include emissions and economic costs, risks in the production process, shipping complexities, and doubts concerning CCS. Interests of conservative politics and pro-coal/CCS influencers dominate how security is framed, deprioritising energy justice concerns and privileging coal interests and mining jobs over potentially more resilient renewable energy pathways and jobs. The research has implications for future research, policy development and energy system planning.
•Energy security frameworks need inclusion of energy justice dimensions.•A revised six-dimension energy security-justice framework is developed.•Brown coal ‘retrofit’ carbon capture and storage H2 generation export case study.•Security risks/opportunities identified in Australia-Japan coal-hydrogen case.•Energy justice, renewables jobs, emissions and externalities’ risks are sidelined.