Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Czerniak, Stanisław

Titel

MAX SCHELER—BERNHARD WALDENFELS. TWO PHENOMENOLOGICAL CONCEPTIONS OF SUFFERING

Ist Teil von

• Dialogue and Universalism, 2018, Vol.28 (4), p.53-73

Ort / Verlag

Institute of Philosophy And Sociology of The Polish Academy of Sciences And Philosophy for Dialogue Foundation

Erscheinungsjahr

2018

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• This comparative study of Max Scheler’s and Bernhard Waldenfels’ conceptions shows how they differ in their philosophical assumptions. Whereas Scheler’s strove to define the essence of suffering, which he saw in the objective situation of being a victim(sacrificing the inferior for the superior good), Waldenfels emphasized the intentional aspect of suffering and its connections to activity (suffering was to be the necessary and passive “other side” of activity). In this context Waldenfels introduced the distinction between suffering as a) that what happens to us, and b) that what we subjectively feel as“brutally” imposed upon us, ignoring all eidetic questions related to suffering as well as the metaphysical threads which Scheler addressed. The author runs a detailed and critical analysis of Scheler’s position, to which he voices multiple objections, and concludes that it coincides conceptually with the axiological conception of tragedy he propounded in his work On the Tragic. In the section on Waldenfels the author reviews the polemical arguments against his views voiced by several contemporary German philosophers.