Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Hoge, Robert D
• Andrews, D. A

Titel

Assessing the Youthful Offender : Issues and Techniques

Ist Teil von

• Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology Library

Ort / Verlag

Boston, MA : Springer US

Erscheinungsjahr

1996

Link zum Volltext

• Volltext

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• 1. Conceptual and Theoretical Background -- 2. Decision Making within Juvenile Justice Systems -- 3. The Role of Psychological Assessments in the Juvenile Justice Decision Process -- 4. Assessing Aptitudes and Achievement Levels -- 5. Assessing Personality, Attitudes, and Behaviors -- 6. Assessing Environmental Factors -- 7. Diagnostic and Classification Systems -- 8. Conclusions and Recommendations -- Appendix 1: Instruments and Procedures Identified in This Volume -- Appendix 2: Addresses of Major Test Publishers -- References -- Author Index
• Our society's preoccupation with crime and fear of crime appears to have shifted its focus to the juvenile offender. Both electronic and print media continuously warn us that juvenile offenders are increasingly younger and more virulent. The demographics of our population suggest that there will only be more juvenile offenders to fear in the near future. All of these concerns arise in a social climate that is characterized by an everincreasing demand for stronger retributive measures against the offender. The belief that only harsh justice will protect us from the ravages of juveniles has become dominant. Increasingly, perceptions and politics, rather than scientific data, dominate policy making with regard to youthful offenders. In Assessing the Youthful Offender: Issues and Techniques, Robert D. Hoge and D. A. Andrews make a restrained, rational, and ultimately persuasive argument for the use of standardized psychological assessments in the effective management of youth within juvenile justice systems. They clarify how what we already know about the cause and management of youthful criminal activity can be incorporated into standardized testing and that the information obtained from testing can improve the administration of criminal justice. Moreover, this information is useful whatever the theoretical biases of those who administer the justice system. The efficiency of policies of either retribution, deterrence, or rehabilitation is only enhanced by reliance on data