Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Teixeira, Pedro[Herausgeber]
• Jongbloed, Ben[Herausgeber]
• Dill, David[Herausgeber]
• Amaral, Alberto[Herausgeber]

Titel

Markets in Higer Education : Rhetoric or Reality?

Ist Teil von

• Higher Education Dynamics : 6

Ort / Verlag

Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands

Erscheinungsjahr

2004

Link zum Volltext

• Volltext

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Markets in Higher Education: Do They Promote Internal Efficiency? -- Cost-Sharing and Equity in Higher Education: Implications of Income Contingent Loans -- Transparency and Quality in Higher Education Markets -- Regulation and Competition in Higher Education -- The Evaluation of Welfare Under Alternative Models of Higher Education Finance -- Higher Education Policy as Orthodoxy: Being One Tale of Doxological Drift, Political Intention and Changing Circumstances -- Market Coordination of Higher Education: The United States -- �́�Madly off in All Directions�́�: Higher Education, Marketisation and Canadian Federalism -- Australian Higher Education: National and Global Markets -- The Higher Education Market in the United Kingdom -- Rapid Expansion and Extensive Deregulation: The Development of Markets for Higher Education in the Netherlands -- Is There a Higher Education Market in Portugal? -- Higher Education and Markets in France -- Conclusion
• This volume presents the most comprehensive international discussion of the role of markets in higher education ever published. It reflects on both the political and economic implications of the rising trend towards introducing market elements in higher education. The book draws together many leading international scholars in the economic and policy analysis of higher education to explore different theoretical perspectives and present new empirical evidence on market mechanisms in higher education in several Western countries. The authors present a dispassionate and ideologically neutral view of the advantages and disadvantages of the introduction of market-mechanisms in higher education and of its effects in terms of access, equity, quality of provision, student learning, research and scholarship, and so on. And they balance the performance of markets in higher education against the alternative of more, or a different kind of, governmental intervention