Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• OECD
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development,

Titel

OECD Public Governance Reviews Mobilising Evidence for Good Governance Taking Stock of Principles and Standards for Policy Design, Implementation and Evaluation

Ort / Verlag

Paris : OECD Publishing,

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Link zum Volltext

• OECD iLibrary

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Intro -- Foreword -- Acknowledgements -- Table of contents -- Executive summary -- 1 Introduction -- The role of quality evidence to support evidence-informed policy-making -- What are the challenges of contemporary policy-making? -- Defining the role of evidence and evidence-informed policy-making -- The role of the use of evidence in improving public sector effectiveness -- Achieving the promise of evidence-informed policy-making -- The need to create a supportive institutional environment -- Promoting the use of evidence and improving the evidence to policy interface through knowledge brokerage -- The need for standards of evidence to bring coherence to policy making processes -- Ensuring the good governance of evidence -- Goal and focus of this report -- Methodology -- Conceptual framework -- Desk research -- Engaging with experts -- Country coverage -- Principles for the Good Governance of Evidence -- Standards of evidence -- Consolidated overview of the principles and standards -- Principles for the good governance of evidence -- Appropriate evidence for the policy concern -- Ensuring integrity (honest brokerage) -- Accountability -- Contestability -- Public representation in decision-making -- Transparency in the use of evidence -- Building evidence through emerging technologies and mobilising data -- Standards of evidence -- Standards concerning evidence synthesis. -- Theory of change and logic underpinning an intervention: Should the intervention work? -- Design and development of policies and programmes: Can it work? -- Efficacy of an intervention: Does it work? -- Effectiveness of interventions: Does it work in the real world? -- Cost effectiveness of interventions: Is it worth it? -- Implementation and scale up of interventions -- References -- Notes -- 2 Principles for the good governance of evidence.
• Appropriate evidence for the policy concern -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches -- Evidence that addresses the multiple policy concerns at stake -- Evidence that best informs policy goals -- Evidence that is applicable to the local policy context -- Ensuring integrity (honest brokerage) -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches -- Honest brokerage -- Humility -- Ethical conduct -- Conflicts of interest -- Addressing the risk of capture and bias in the policy process -- Accountability -- Why is it important? -- Summary of Mapping Approaches -- Clear Roles of Policy Makers and Advisors in the Evidentiary Advisory Process -- Leadership in the Evidentiary Advisory Process -- Contestability -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches -- Processes for when evidence is uncertain and contested. -- Processes for stakeholder engagement in participatory evidence assessments and recommendations -- Public representation in decision making -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches -- Stakeholder and public consultations -- Stakeholder Engagement in Evidence Synthesis -- Transparency in the use of evidence -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches -- Transparency of decision making -- Transparency in disclosing information -- Building evidence through emerging technologies and mobilising data -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches -- Achieving the promise of emerging technologies through appropriate institutional set ups -- Developing frameworks and principles for the data governance -- Balancing the dynamics of innovation and new technologies through good governance.
• The development of principles for the use of emerging technologies and new data and their impact on evidence-informed policymaking -- References -- Notes -- 3 Standards of Evidence: Mapping the experience in OECD countries -- Introduction -- What are standards of evidence for? -- Assessing the strength of evidence of an intervention -- Assessing bodies of evidence -- Reviewing the evidence base for an intervention -- Supporting the development of an intervention -- What forms of evidence are covered by standards of evidence? -- What are the seven issues covered in the standards of evidence? -- Evidence Synthesis -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches -- Standards for assessing the quantity and quality of existing reviews. -- Standards for executing evidence synthesis -- Standards for setting up and scoping a review -- Standards for searching research -- Standards for rating the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations -- Theory of Change and Logic Model underpinning the programme -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches -- Standards concerning theory of change -- Standards concerning the logic model underpinning an intervention -- Design and Development of Programmes -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches -- Standards for establishing the feasibility of an intervention -- Standards for piloting the outcomes of an intervention -- Research and Evaluation design -- Sample -- Measurement -- Approach to analysis -- Findings and conclusions -- Efficacy of an Intervention -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches -- Evaluation design -- Sample -- Measurements -- Approach to analysis -- Findings and impacts -- Effectiveness of Interventions -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches.
• Evaluation design -- Sample -- Measurements -- Approach of analysis -- Finding and impacts -- A postscript on systems-based approaches to evaluation -- Cost (effectiveness) of Interventions -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches -- Cost information -- Cost rating or assessment -- Standards concerning economic evaluations -- Standards for framing an economic evaluation -- Standards for identifying the programme/policy impacts -- Standards for estimating programme costs -- Standards for valuing the costs and benefits of programmes -- Standards for handling estimate uncertainty -- Standards for reporting the results of economic evaluations -- Implementation and Scale up of Interventions -- Why is it important? -- Summary of the mapping of existing approaches -- Standards concerning the delivery and implementation of an intervention -- Experiences of the implementation of an intervention -- Standards concerning the dissemination readiness and system readiness -- References -- Notes -- 4 Conclusion -- What has this report achieved? -- Opportunities for future work -- References -- Note -- Annex A. Overview of the principles for the use of evidence across jurisdictions -- Annex B. Mapping of Existing Standards of Evidence across a Range of Jurisdictions.
• Governments are seeking to improve evidence-based policy making as well as trust in decision-making processes. This report offers a first global mapping of principles for the good governance of evidence in policy making, as well as standards of evidence from a significant range of OECD countries and international research bodies.
• Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.