Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Willcocks, Leslie P[Herausgeber]
• Sauer, Chris[Herausgeber]
• Lacity, Mary C[Herausgeber]

Titel

Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 3 [electronic resource]

Auflage

1st ed. 2016

Ort / Verlag

Cham : Springer International Publishing

Erscheinungsjahr

2016

Link zum Volltext

• SpringerLink Books - AutoHoldings

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Description based upon print version of record.
• Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters.
• Introduction- Leslie Willcocks, Chris Sauer and Mary Lacity -- PART VI. DESIGN SCIENCE APPROACHES -- Chapter 19: McKay, J., Marshall, P., and Hirschheim, R. (2012), “The design construct in information systems design science,” JIT, Vol. 27, pp. 125–139 -- Chapter 20: Arnott, D., and Pervan, G., (2014) “A critical analysis of decision support systems research revisited: the rise of design science,” JIT, Vol 29, pp. 269-293 -- Chapter 21: Hanseth, O., and Lyytinen, K. (2010), “Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building the internet.” JIT, Vol. 25, pp. 1-19 -- Chapter 22: Heinrich, L., and Riedi, R. (2013), “Understanding the dominance and advocacy of the design-oriented research approach in the business informatics community: a history-based examination,” JIT, Vol. 28, pp. 34-49 -- Chapter 23: Salmela, H. (2008), “Analysing business losses caused by information systems risk: a business process analysis approach,” JIT, Vol. 23, pp. 185-202 -- PART VI. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES -- Chapter 24: Price, R., and Shanks, G. (2005), “A semiotic information quality framework: development and comparative analysis,” JIT, Vol. 20, pp. 88-120 -- Chapter 25: Merali, Y. (2006), “Complexity and Information Systems: the emergent domain,” JIT, Vol. 21. Pp. 216-228 -- Chapter 26: Wilson, M. (2004), “A conceptual framework for studying gender in information systems research,” JIT, Vol. 19, pp. 81-92. .
• This edited three volume edition brings together significant papers previously published in the Journal of information Technology (JIT) over its 30 year publication history. The three volumes of Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems celebrate the methodological pluralism used to advance our understanding of information technology's role in the world today. In addition to quantitative methods from the positivist tradition, JIT also values methodological articles from critical research perspectives, interpretive traditions, historical perspectives, grounded theory, and action research and design science approaches. Volume 1 covers Critical Research, Grounded Theory, and Historical Approaches. Volume 2 deals with Interpretive Approaches and also explores Action Research. Volume 3 focuses on Design Science Approaches and discusses Alternative Approaches including Semiotics Research, Complexity Theory and Gender in IS Research. The Journal of Information Technology (JIT) was started in 1986 by Professors Frank Land and Igor Aleksander with the aim of bringing technology and management together and bridging the ‘great divide’ between the two disciplines. The Journal was created with the vision of making the impact of complex interactions and developments in technology more accessible to a wider audience. Retaining this initial focus, the JIT has gone on to extend into new and innovative areas of research such as the launch of JITTC in 2010. A high impact journal, JIT shall continue to publish leading trends based on significant research in the field. .