Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Adams, Julia[Herausgeber]
• Andrew, Collier
• Anthony, Elliott
• Daniel, Breslau
• Dutton, Michael
• Elizabeth Rose, Wingrove
• Emily, Hauptmann
• Geoff, Eley
• George, Steinmetz
• Keane, Webb
• Margaret R., Somers
• Michael, Burawoy
• Philip, Mirowski
• Sandra, Harding
• Sophia, Mihic
• Steinmetz, George[Herausgeber]
• Stephen G., Engelmann
• Timothy, Mitchell
• Webb, Keane
• William H. , Sewell Jr

Titel

The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences : Positivism and Its Epistemological Others

Ist Teil von

• Politics, History, and Culture

Ort / Verlag

Durham : Duke University Press

Erscheinungsjahr

[2005]

Link zum Volltext

• De Gruyter E-Books EBA bis 31.12.2026 (ZDB-23-DGG-eba)
• De Gruyter E-Books EBA bis 31.12.2026 (ZDB-23-DGG-eba)

Link zu anderen Inhalten

• Cover

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences provides a remarkable comparative assessment of the variations of positivism and alternative epistemologies in the contemporary human sciences. Often declared obsolete, positivism is alive and well in a number of the fields; in others, its influence is significantly diminished. The essays in this collection investigate its mutations in form and degree across the social science disciplines. Looking at methodological assumptions field by field, individual essays address anthropology, area studies, economics, history, the philosophy of science, political science and political theory, and sociology. Essayists trace disciplinary developments through the long twentieth century, focusing on the decades since World War II.Contributors explore and contrast some of the major alternatives to positivist epistemologies, including Marxism, psychoanalysis, poststructuralism, narrative theory, and actor-network theory. Almost all the essays are written by well-known practitioners of the fields discussed. Some essayists approach positivism and anti-positivism via close readings of texts influential in their respective disciplines. Some engage in ethnographies of the present-day human sciences; others are more historical in method. All of them critique contemporary social scientific practice. Together, they trace a trajectory of thought and method running from the past through the present and pointing toward possible futures.Contributors. Andrew Abbott, Daniel Breslau, Michael Burawoy, Andrew Collier , Michael Dutton, Geoff Eley, Anthony Elliott, Stephen Engelmann, Sandra Harding, Emily Hauptmann, Webb Keane, Tony Lawson, Sophia Mihic, Philip Mirowski, Timothy Mitchell, William H. Sewell Jr., Margaret R. Somers, George Steinmetz, Elizabeth Wingrove