Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Nersessian, Nancy J[Herausgeber]

Titel

The Process of Science : Contemporary Philosophical Approaches to Understanding Scientific Practice

Ist Teil von

• Science and Philosophy : 3

Ort / Verlag

Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands

Erscheinungsjahr

1987

Link zum Volltext

• Volltext

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Method in the philosophy of science and epistemology: How to inquire about inquiry and knowledge -- �́�Twixt method and madness -- Historical realism and contextual objectivity: A developing perspective in the philosophy of science -- Research problems and the understanding of science -- Twenty years after -- The semantic approach to scientific theories -- The garden in the machine: Gender relations, the processes of science, and feminist epistemological strategies -- The cognitive study of science -- A cognitive �́� historical approach to meaning in scientific theories -- Naturalizing observation -- Realist methodology in genetics -- Parsimony and the units of selection
• For some time now the philosophy of science has been undergoing a major transfor℗Ư mation. It began when the 'received view' of scientific knowledge -that developed by logical positivists and their intellectual descendants - was challenged as bearing little resemblance to and having little relevance for the understanding of real science. Subsequently, an overwhelming amount of criticism has been added. One would be hard-pressed to find anyone who would support the 'received view' today. Yet, in the search for a new analysis of scientific knowledge, this view continues to exert influence over the tenor of much of present-day philosophy of science; in particular, over its problems and its methods of analysis. There has, however, emerged an area within the discipline - called by some the 'new philosophy of science' - that has been engaged in transforming the problems and methods of philosophy of science. While there is far from a consensus of beliefs in this area, most of the following contentions would be affirmed by those working in it: - that science is an open-ended, on-going activity, whose character has changed significantly during its history - that science is not a monolithic enterprise - that good science can lead to false theories - that science has its roots in everyday circumstances, needs, methods, concepts, etc