UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 547

Sortiert nach

PROMIS fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, pain behavior, physical function, depression, anxiety, and anger scales demonstrate ecological validity

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016-06, Vol.74, p.194-206

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The Clinician Guideline Determinants Questionnaire was developed and validated to support tailored implementation planning

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019-09, Vol.113, p.129-136

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Who is in this study, anyway? Guidelines for a useful Table 1

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019-10, Vol.114, p.125-132

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Registry-based randomized controlled trials merged the strength of randomized controlled trails and observational studies and give rise to more pragmatic trials

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018-01, Vol.93, p.120-127

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The PRECIS-2 tool has good interrater reliability and modest discriminant validity

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2017-08, Vol.88, p.113-121

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

No inexplicable disagreements between real-world data–based nonrandomized controlled studies and randomized controlled trials were found

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021-05, Vol.133, p.1-13

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2013-09, Vol.66 (9), p.982-993

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Validation in prediction research: the waste by data splitting

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018-11, Vol.103, p.131-133

Steyerberg, Ewout W.

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A Gentle Introduction to Instrumental Variables

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2022-09, Vol.149, p.203-205

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: Responsiveness, the longitudinal aspect of validity

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021-12, Vol.140, p.159-162

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2015-05, Vol.68 (5), p.574-583

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A systematic review highlights the need to investigate the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning in patients with low back pain

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018-03, Vol.95, p.73-93

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021-01, Vol.129, p.172-175

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal–external, and external validation

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016-01, Vol.69, p.245-247

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019-07, Vol.111, p.49-59.e1

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Effect measure modification conceptualized using selection diagrams as mediation by mechanisms of varying population-level relevance

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019-09, Vol.113, p.123-128

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Randomized controlled trials reporting patient-reported outcomes with no significant differences between study groups are potentially susceptible to unjustified conclusions—a systematic review

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2024-05, Vol.169, p.111308-111308, Article 111308

2024

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2013-09, Vol.66 (9), p.973-981

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A systematic review highlighting poor quality of evidence for content validity of quality of life instruments in female chronic pelvic pain

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2022-09, Vol.149, p.1-11

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2015-04, Vol.68 (4), p.435-441

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016-01, Vol.69, p.79-88

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Mortality prediction in intensive care units including premorbid functional status improved performance and internal validity

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2022-02, Vol.142, p.230-241

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2012-09, Vol.65 (9), p.934-939

2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

No clear choice between Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies to assess methodological quality in cross-sectional studies of health-related quality of life and breast cancer

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2020-04, Vol.120, p.94-103

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2013-04, Vol.66 (4), p.408-414

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

1 – 25 von 547

Suche als RSS-Feed

Aktive Filter

Zeitschrift / SerieJournal Of Clinical Epidemiology

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(547)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(547)

Publikationsform

Artikel
(547)

Sprache

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Health Care Sciences & Services
(533)
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
(533)
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
(533)
Science & Technology
(533)
Epidemiology
(477)
Validity
(466)
Humans
(447)
Biological And Medical Sciences
(297)
Medical Sciences
(292)
Female
(249)
Reproducibility Of Results
(249)
Internal Medicine
(234)
Male
(229)
Studies
(182)
Public Health. Hygiene-Occupational Medicine
(180)
Public Health. Hygiene
(178)
Middle Aged
(175)
Adult
(154)
Aged
(147)
General Aspects
(141)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Kollektion

Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect (DFG Nationallizenzen)
(547)
Ingenta
(547)
Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
(547)
IngentaConnect Journals
(242)

Zeitschrift / Serie

J Clin Epidemiol
(10)
J. Clin. Epidemiol
(1)

Neu hinzugefügt

... seit 90 Tagen
(2)

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

PROMIS fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, pain behavior, physical function, depression, anxiety, and anger scales demonstrate ecological validity

The Clinician Guideline Determinants Questionnaire was developed and validated to support tailored implementation planning

Who is in this study, anyway? Guidelines for a useful Table 1

Registry-based randomized controlled trials merged the strength of randomized controlled trails and observational studies and give rise to more pragmatic trials

The PRECIS-2 tool has good interrater reliability and modest discriminant validity

No inexplicable disagreements between real-world data–based nonrandomized controlled studies and randomized controlled trials were found

Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers

Validation in prediction research: the waste by data splitting

A Gentle Introduction to Instrumental Variables

Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: Responsiveness, the longitudinal aspect of validity

Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties

A systematic review highlights the need to investigate the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning in patients with low back pain

Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research

Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal–external, and external validation

Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study

Effect measure modification conceptualized using selection diagrams as mediation by mechanisms of varying population-level relevance

Randomized controlled trials reporting patient-reported outcomes with no significant differences between study groups are potentially susceptible to unjustified conclusions—a systematic review

Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs

A systematic review highlighting poor quality of evidence for content validity of quality of life instruments in female chronic pelvic pain

A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus

Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust

Mortality prediction in intensive care units including premorbid functional status improved performance and internal validity

Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement

No clear choice between Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies to assess methodological quality in cross-sectional studies of health-related quality of life and breast cancer

Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern