UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

NIH plans grant-review overhaul to reduce bias

Nature (London), 2022-12, Vol.612 (7941), p.602-603

Kozlov, Max

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research

Nature (London), 2020-05, Vol.581 (7807), p.130-131

Kwon, Diana

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Scholarship: Beyond the paper

Nature (London), 2013-03, Vol.495 (7442), p.437-440

Priem, Jason

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Will the pandemic permanently alter scientific publishing?

Nature (London), 2020-06, Vol.582 (7811), p.167-168

Callaway, Ewen

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Future impact: Predicting scientific success

Nature (London), 2012-09, Vol.489 (7415), p.201-202

2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Strife at eLife: inside a journal's quest to upend science publishing

Nature (London), 2023-03, Vol.615 (7954), p.780-781

Abbott, Alison

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors

Nature (London), 2016-02, Vol.530 (7588), p.27-29

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations

Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 2016-03, Vol.3 (1), p.349-375

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer review: Troubled from the start

Nature (London), 2016-04, Vol.532 (7599), p.306-308

Csiszar, Alex

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer review: Trial by Twitter

Nature (London), 2011-01, Vol.469 (7330), p.286-287

Mandavilli, Apoorva

2011

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Sociology of science: Big data deserve a bigger audience

Nature (London), 2012-02, Vol.482 (7385), p.308-308

Huberman, Bernardo A

2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

AI peer reviewers unleashed to ease publishing grind

Nature (London), 2018-11, Vol.563 (7733), p.609-610

Heaven, Douglas

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Structure peer review to make it more robust

Nature (London), 2024-04, Vol.628 (8008), p.476

Malički, Mario

2024

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Let's make peer review scientific

Nature (London), 2016-07, Vol.535 (7610), p.31-33

Rennie, Drummond

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Research grants: Conform and be funded

Nature (London), 2012-12, Vol.492 (7427), p.34-36

2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer review: Revise rules on conflicts of interest

Nature (London), 2016-11, Vol.539 (7628), p.168-168

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Could Bitcoin technology help science?

Nature (London), 2017-12, Vol.552 (7685), p.301-302

Extance, Andy

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

More time for research: fund people not projects

Nature (London), 2011-09, Vol.477 (7366), p.529-531

Ioannidis, John P A

2011

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The politics of publication

Nature (London), 2003-03, Vol.422 (6929), p.259-261

Lawrence, Peter A

2003

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A unified reviewing format for grant applications and evaluations

EMBO reports, 2018-02, Vol.19 (2), p.187-188

Janke, Carsten

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Whaling permits: Japan's whaling is unscientific

Nature (London), 2016-01, Vol.529 (7586), p.283-283

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Editorial / Éditorial

Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology, 2018-09, Vol.96 (9), p.iii

Pierce, Grant N

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Research: A standard for policy-relevant science

Nature (London), 2013-09, Vol.501 (7466), p.159-160

Boyd, Ian

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Soaring science publications in Covid-19: Separate the wheat from the chaff

M.S. Médecine sciences, 2021-04, Vol.37 (4), p.315

Corvol, Pierre

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A systematic review and meta‐analysis of nonpharmacological interventions for children and adolescents with selective mutism

JCPP advances, 2023-09, Vol.3 (3), p.e12166-e12166

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

NIH plans grant-review overhaul to reduce bias

How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research

Scholarship: Beyond the paper

Will the pandemic permanently alter scientific publishing?

Future impact: Predicting scientific success

Strife at eLife: inside a journal's quest to upend science publishing

Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors

How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations

Peer review: Troubled from the start

Peer review: Trial by Twitter

Sociology of science: Big data deserve a bigger audience

AI peer reviewers unleashed to ease publishing grind

Structure peer review to make it more robust

Let's make peer review scientific

Research grants: Conform and be funded

Peer review: Revise rules on conflicts of interest

Could Bitcoin technology help science?

More time for research: fund people not projects

The politics of publication

A unified reviewing format for grant applications and evaluations

Whaling permits: Japan's whaling is unscientific

Editorial / Éditorial

Research: A standard for policy-relevant science

Soaring science publications in Covid-19: Separate the wheat from the chaff

A systematic review and meta‐analysis of nonpharmacological interventions for children and adolescents with selective mutism

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern