UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 23.333

Sortiert nach

Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network

BMC medicine, 2010-04, Vol.8 (1), p.24-24, Article 24

2010

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer review of grant applications: criteria used and qualitative study of reviewer practices

PloS one, 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e46054-e46054

2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Open access is tiring out peer reviewers

Nature (London), 2014-11, Vol.515 (7528), p.467-467

Arns, Martijn

2014

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The importance of being second

PLoS biology, 2018-01, Vol.16 (1), p.e2005203-e2005203

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

NIH mulls rules for validating key results

Nature (London), 2013-08, Vol.500 (7460), p.14-16

Wadman, Meredith

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation

PloS one, 2016-05, Vol.11 (5), p.e0154217-e0154217

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Why animal research needs to improve

Nature (London), 2011-09, Vol.477 (7366), p.511-511

Macleod, Malcolm

2011

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Non-financial conflicts of interest in academic grant evaluation: a qualitative study of multiple stakeholders in France

PloS one, 2012-04, Vol.7 (4), p.e35247-e35247

2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture

International journal of health geographics, 2017-01, Vol.16 (1), p.3-3, Article 3

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Teleconference versus face-to-face scientific peer review of grant application: effects on review outcomes

PloS one, 2013-08, Vol.8 (8), p.e71693-e71693

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Nature journals offer double-blind review

Nature (London), 2015-02, Vol.518 (7539), p.274-274

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer review: tips from field experts for junior reviewers

BMC medicine, 2015-11, Vol.13 (274), p.269-269, Article 269

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer

BMC medicine, 2015-11, Vol.13 (274), p.270-270, Article 270

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Characterization of the peer review network at the Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health

PloS one, 2014-08, Vol.9 (8), p.e104244-e104244

2014

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels

BMJ open, 2015-09, Vol.5 (9), p.e009138-e009138

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

An analysis of preliminary and post-discussion priority scores for grant applications peer reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH

PloS one, 2010-11, Vol.5 (11), p.e13526-e13526

2010

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Are Impact Factors corrupting truth and utility in biomedical research?

Vaccine, 2013-12, Vol.31 (51), p.6041-6042

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Being critical and constructive: a guide to peer reviewing for librarians

Journal of the Medical Library Association, 2017-01, Vol.105 (1), p.1-3

Akers, Katherine G

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Announcement: double-blind peer review

Nature genetics, 2015-03, Vol.47 (3), p.187-187

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Equity for open-access journal publishing

PLoS biology, 2009-08, Vol.7 (8), p.e1000165-e1000165

Shieber, Stuart M

2009

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2006-08, Vol.59 (8), p.842-848

2006

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Trust-but verify-scientific findings

The Journal of oral implantology, 2015-02, Vol.41 (1), p.1-1

Rutkowski, James L

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity

PloS one, 2015-06, Vol.10 (6), p.e0127556-e0127556

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Predatory publishers are corrupting open access

Nature (London), 2012-09, Vol.489 (7415), p.179-179

Beall, Jeffrey

2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

UK science will be judged on impact

Nature (London), 2010-11, Vol.468 (7322), p.357-357

Gilbert, Natasha

2010

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

1 – 25 von 23.333

Suche als RSS-Feed

Aktive Filter

KollektionEmerald Management 200

ThemaStudies

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(22.179)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(22.262)

Publikationsform

4 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Sprache

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Science & Technology
(16.631)
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
(11.279)
Humans
(10.657)
Systematic Review
(8.760)
Social Sciences
(6.192)
Literature Reviews
(6.120)
Medical Research
(5.618)
Review
(4.449)
Female
(3.915)
Analysis
(3.760)
Science & Technology - Other Topics
(3.698)
Meta-Analysis
(3.667)
Multidisciplinary Sciences
(3.624)
Patients
(3.534)
Male
(3.398)
Health Aspects
(2.986)
Clinical Trials
(2.958)
Medicine
(2.794)
Public Health
(2.703)

14 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Kollektion

EZB Electronic Journals Library
(14.243)
Ingenta
(12.276)
IngentaConnect Journals
(9.891)
SpringerLink (Online service)
(5.205)
WK Lippincott Williams & Wilkins–Connect here FIRST to enable access
(5.040)
EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate
(2.888)
JSTOR
(2.731)
NUS Single-Journal Subscriptions
(2.073)
SpringerLINK Contemporary (Konsortium Baden-Württemberg)
(1.881)
Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
(1.499)
Wiley Online Library
(1.443)
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect (DFG Nationallizenzen)
(1.232)
SAGE Complete
(1.088)
Sociological Abstracts
(1.066)
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
(900)
Taylor & Francis
(798)
Wiley Online Library
(795)
Nexis Uni (LexisNexis)
(793)
Factiva
(774)
PAIS Index
(737)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

Plos One
(3.539)
Biomed Research International
(1.087)
Journal Of Clinical Epidemiology
(288)
Pharmacoeconomics
(257)
Academy Of Management Learning & Education
(233)
Bmc Public Health
(222)
Oncotargets And Therapy
(190)
International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health
(185)
Applied Microbiology And Biotechnology
(169)
Vaccine
(164)

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network

Peer review of grant applications: criteria used and qualitative study of reviewer practices

Open access is tiring out peer reviewers

The importance of being second

NIH mulls rules for validating key results

Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation

Why animal research needs to improve

Non-financial conflicts of interest in academic grant evaluation: a qualitative study of multiple stakeholders in France

Ovarian cancer: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture

Teleconference versus face-to-face scientific peer review of grant application: effects on review outcomes

Nature journals offer double-blind review

Peer review: tips from field experts for junior reviewers

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer

Characterization of the peer review network at the Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health

A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels

An analysis of preliminary and post-discussion priority scores for grant applications peer reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH

Are Impact Factors corrupting truth and utility in biomedical research?

Being critical and constructive: a guide to peer reviewing for librarians

Announcement: double-blind peer review

Equity for open-access journal publishing

Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications

Trust-but verify-scientific findings

Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity

Predatory publishers are corrupting open access

UK science will be judged on impact

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern