UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

Sortiert nach

Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...

Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals

PloS one, 2016-01, Vol.11 (1), p.e0147913-e0147913

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?

PloS one, 2017-10, Vol.12 (10), p.e0186111-e0186111

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews

PloS one, 2022-01, Vol.17 (1), p.e0259238-e0259238

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Conflict of interest in the peer review process: A survey of peer review reports

PloS one, 2023-06, Vol.18 (6), p.e0286908-e0286908

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals

PloS one, 2021-10, Vol.16 (10), p.e0257919-e0257919

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise

PloS one, 2016-11, Vol.11 (11), p.e0166387-e0166387

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The peer review gap: A longitudinal case study of gendered publishing and occupational patterns in a female-rich discipline, Western North America (1974-2016)

PloS one, 2017-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e0188403-e0188403

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015)

PloS one, 2018-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e0193148-e0193148

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review—A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists

PloS one, 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e0244529-e0244529

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Gender Bias in Peer Review of Research Grants: A Rapid Scoping Review

PloS one, 2017-01, Vol.12 (1), p.e0169718-e0169718

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers' confidential comments to editors

PloS one, 2021-11, Vol.16 (11), p.e0260558-e0260558

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

On the agreement between bibliometrics and peer review: Evidence from the Italian research assessment exercises

PloS one, 2020-11, Vol.15 (11), p.e0242520-e0242520

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal

PloS one, 2020-08, Vol.15 (8), p.e0237804-e0237804

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Conflict of interest in the peer review process: A survey of peer review reports

PloS one, 2023-01, Vol.18 (6)

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Substantial agreement of referee recommendations at a general medical journal--a peer review evaluation at Deutsches Ärzteblatt International

PloS one, 2013-05, Vol.8 (5), p.e61401-e61401

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer review, program officers and science funding

PloS one, 2011-04, Vol.6 (4), p.e18680-e18680

2011

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals

PloS one, 2015-08, Vol.10 (8), p.e0132557-e0132557

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A case for revisiting peer review: Implications for professional self-regulation and quality improvement

PloS one, 2018-06, Vol.13 (6), p.e0199961-e0199961

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

How do authors' perceptions of their papers compare with co-authors' perceptions and peer-review decisions?

PloS one, 2024, Vol.19 (4), p.e0300710-e0300710

2024

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer Review Evaluation Process of Marie Curie Actions under EU's Seventh Framework Programme for Research

PloS one, 2015-06, Vol.10 (6), p.e0130753-e0130753

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers

PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189311-e0189311

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Sample size and precision in NIH peer review

PloS one, 2008-07, Vol.3 (7), p.e2761-e2761

2008

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Heterogeneity of inter-rater reliabilities of grant peer reviews and its determinants: a general estimating equations approach

PloS one, 2012-10, Vol.7 (10), p.e48509-e48509

2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Characterization of the peer review network at the Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health

PloS one, 2014-08, Vol.9 (8), p.e104244-e104244

2014

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals

PloS one, 2012-04, Vol.7 (4), p.e35621-e35621

2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

1 – 25 von 17.838

Suche als RSS-Feed

Aktive Filter

Zeitschrift / SeriePlos One

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(17.838)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(17.838)

Publikationsform

Artikel
(17.838)

Sprache

Englisch
(17.838)
Japanisch
(1.396)
Norwegisch
(46)

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Science & Technology
(16.124)
Multidisciplinary Sciences
(16.117)
Science & Technology - Other Topics
(16.117)
Humans
(10.827)
Biology And Life Sciences
(10.821)
Medicine And Health Sciences
(10.298)
Social Sciences
(8.336)
People And Places
(6.913)
Research And Analysis Methods
(6.466)
Female
(6.211)
Analysis
(5.845)
Male
(5.667)
Health Aspects
(4.824)
Studies
(4.107)
Adult
(3.739)
Physical Sciences
(3.514)
Public Health
(3.168)
Medicine
(2.921)
Risk Factors
(2.772)
Adolescent
(2.730)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Kollektion

EZB Free E-Journals
(17.838)
IngentaConnect Journals
(15.856)
Ingenta
(15.856)
Sociological Abstracts
(974)
PAIS Index
(84)
Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
(68)
Ebook Central Perpetual and DDA
(1)
eBooks on EBSCOhost
(1)
Springer Books
(1)

4 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

Plos Pathogens
(5)
Grantee Submission
(4)
Plos Medicine
(3)
Biorxiv
(2)
Getting To Good: Research Integrity In The Biomedical Sciences
(1)
Online Submission
(1)
Plos 1
(1)

2 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Neu hinzugefügt

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals

Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?

Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews

Conflict of interest in the peer review process: A survey of peer review reports

Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals

The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise

The peer review gap: A longitudinal case study of gendered publishing and occupational patterns in a female-rich discipline, Western North America (1974-2016)

Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015)

Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review—A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists

Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Gender Bias in Peer Review of Research Grants: A Rapid Scoping Review

Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers' confidential comments to editors

On the agreement between bibliometrics and peer review: Evidence from the Italian research assessment exercises

A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal

Conflict of interest in the peer review process: A survey of peer review reports

Substantial agreement of referee recommendations at a general medical journal--a peer review evaluation at Deutsches Ärzteblatt International

Peer review, program officers and science funding

How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals

A case for revisiting peer review: Implications for professional self-regulation and quality improvement

How do authors' perceptions of their papers compare with co-authors' perceptions and peer-review decisions?

Peer Review Evaluation Process of Marie Curie Actions under EU's Seventh Framework Programme for Research

Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers

Sample size and precision in NIH peer review

Heterogeneity of inter-rater reliabilities of grant peer reviews and its determinants: a general estimating equations approach

Characterization of the peer review network at the Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health

Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern