UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

Sortiert nach

Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...

Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2017-11, Vol.114 (48), p.12708-12713

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer Review: A System under Stress

Bioscience, 2017-05, Vol.67 (5), p.407-410

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study

BMJ (Online), 2014-07, Vol.349 (7965), p.g4145

International edition, 2014

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Gender Quotas, Competitions, and Peer Review: Experimental Evidence on the Backlash Against Women

Management science, 2018-08, Vol.64 (8), p.3501-3516

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal

Functional ecology, 2023-05, Vol.37 (5), p.1144-1157

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal

Functional ecology, 2016-01, Vol.30 (1), p.140-153

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

On peer review-then, now, and soon to be?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2023-03, Vol.120 (11), p.e2302593120-e2302593120

Berenbaum, May R

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Publishing While Female: are Women Held to Higher Standards? Evidence from Peer Review

The Economic journal (London), 2022-11, Vol.132 (648), p.2951-2991

Hengel, Erin

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Double‐blind peer review—An experiment

Functional ecology, 2019-01, Vol.33 (1), p.4-6

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Does Peer Review Work? An Experiment of Experimentalism

Stanford law review, 2017-01, Vol.69 (1), p.1-119

Ho, Daniel E.

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

PEER REVIEW OF DATASETS: When, Why, and How

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2015-02, Vol.96 (2), p.191-202

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Nonbinding Peer Review and Effort in Teams: Evidence from a Field Experiment

The Journal of human resources, 2020-10, Vol.55 (4), p.1365-1399

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Effect of revealing authors' conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial

BMJ (Online), 2019-11, Vol.367, p.l5896

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The Associate Editor in the peer review process—what's that?

The Journal of wildlife management, 2023-05, Vol.87 (4), p.n/a

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

CREDIBILITY, PEER REVIEW, AND "NATURE", 1945–1990

Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 2015-09, Vol.69 (3), p.337-352

Baldwin, Melinda

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A Qualitative Review of Literature on Peer Review of Teaching in Higher Education: An Application of the SWOT Framework

Review of educational research, 2014-03, Vol.84 (1), p.112-159

2014

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

THE ROYAL SOCIETY AND THE PREHISTORY OF PEER REVIEW, 1665–1965

The Historical journal, 2018-12, Vol.61 (4), p.863-889

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

PolitePEER: does peer review hurt? A dataset to gauge politeness intensity in the peer reviews

Language resources and evaluation, 2023-05

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Regional sanctions as peer review: The African Union against Egypt (2013) and Sudan (2019)

International political science review, 2021-09, Vol.42 (4), p.451-468

Hellquist, Elin

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Use of double-blind peer review to increase author diversity

Conservation biology, 2015-02, Vol.29 (1), p.297-299

Darling, E. S.

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Author-suggested reviewers: gender differences and influences on the peer review process at an ecology journal

Functional ecology, 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.270-280

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

From the Editor-A Peer Review Crisis or New Normal?

Journal of social work education, 2022-10, Vol.58 (4), p.619-621

Parrish, Danielle E.

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer Review and Scholarly Originality: Let 1,000 Flowers Bloom, but Don't Step on Any

Science, technology, & human values, 2017-01, Vol.42 (1), p.29-61

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Who's Afraid of Peer Review?

Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2013-10, Vol.342 (6154), p.60-65

Bohannon, John

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The Reliability and Validity of Peer Review of Writing in High School AP English Classes

Journal of adolescent & adult literacy, 2016-07, Vol.60 (1), p.13-23

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

1 – 25 von 181.571

Suche als RSS-Feed

Aktive Filter

KollektionJSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(167.886)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(165.574)

Publikationsform

Artikel
(155.898)
Reviews
(21.802)
magazinearticle
(3.739)
Berichte
(48)
Texte
(41)
Bücher
(15)
Tagungsberichte
(15)
Buchkapitel
(10)
Newsletter-Artikel
(2)
Webseiten
(1)

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Sprache

Englisch
(180.109)
Japanisch
(6.845)
Französisch
(1.435)
Deutsch
(550)
Spanisch
(319)
Norwegisch
(90)
Portugiesisch
(77)
Italienisch
(38)
Niederländisch
(27)
Tschechisch
(18)
Latein
(15)
Chinesisch
(11)
Schwedisch
(10)
Russisch
(8)
Türkisch
(7)
Dänisch
(6)
Polnisch
(5)
Croatian
(4)
Persisch
(3)
Arabisch
(2)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Social Sciences
(65.711)
Science & Technology
(40.740)
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
(36.261)
Humans
(31.514)
Education & Educational Research
(18.169)
Education
(16.777)
Arts & Humanities
(16.081)
Studies
(15.771)
Female
(13.391)
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
(13.351)
Business & Economics
(13.273)
Children
(13.226)
Teachers
(12.493)
Sociology
(12.063)
Male
(11.684)
Learning
(11.219)
Students
(10.973)
Teaching Methods
(9.856)
Psychology
(9.612)
United States
(8.695)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Kollektion

JSTOR Complete Journals
(181.571)
EZB Free E-Journals
(46.626)
Journals@Ovid Complete
(40.692)
IngentaConnect Journals
(37.191)
Single Journals
(31.544)
Sociological Abstracts
(27.507)
Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
(25.647)
Project MUSE All Journals
(24.954)
EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate
(24.120)
Project MUSE: Universal journals
(21.487)
SAGE Complete
(21.117)
Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2018
(20.752)
Factiva
(19.401)
Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
(17.854)
IngentaConnect Journals
(17.793)
BMJ
(17.550)
EBSCOhost Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
(16.820)
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
(15.093)
SpringerLINK Contemporary (Konsortium Baden-Württemberg)
(14.359)
Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
(14.046)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

Bmj
(9.872)
Bmj. British Medical Journal
(2.480)
Journal Of Epidemiology And Community Health
(2.204)
Journal Of Medical Ethics
(2.157)
Science
(2.128)
Journal Of Business Ethics
(1.850)
Bmj : British Medical Journal
(1.786)
Child Development
(1.783)
Occupational And Environmental Medicine
(1.672)
Tobacco Control
(1.625)

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Neu hinzugefügt

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review

Peer Review: A System under Stress

Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study

Gender Quotas, Competitions, and Peer Review: Experimental Evidence on the Backlash Against Women

Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal

Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal

On peer review-then, now, and soon to be?

Publishing While Female: are Women Held to Higher Standards? Evidence from Peer Review

Double‐blind peer review—An experiment

Does Peer Review Work? An Experiment of Experimentalism

PEER REVIEW OF DATASETS: When, Why, and How

Nonbinding Peer Review and Effort in Teams: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Effect of revealing authors' conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial

The Associate Editor in the peer review process—what's that?

CREDIBILITY, PEER REVIEW, AND "NATURE", 1945–1990

A Qualitative Review of Literature on Peer Review of Teaching in Higher Education: An Application of the SWOT Framework

THE ROYAL SOCIETY AND THE PREHISTORY OF PEER REVIEW, 1665–1965

PolitePEER: does peer review hurt? A dataset to gauge politeness intensity in the peer reviews

Regional sanctions as peer review: The African Union against Egypt (2013) and Sudan (2019)

Use of double-blind peer review to increase author diversity

Author-suggested reviewers: gender differences and influences on the peer review process at an ecology journal

From the Editor-A Peer Review Crisis or New Normal?

Peer Review and Scholarly Originality: Let 1,000 Flowers Bloom, but Don't Step on Any

Who's Afraid of Peer Review?

The Reliability and Validity of Peer Review of Writing in High School AP English Classes

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern