UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 55.495

Sortiert nach

The ethics of peer review in bioethics

Journal of medical ethics, 2014-10, Vol.40 (10), p.697-701

2014

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

G52(P) Evaluating a safeguarding peer review and reflective supervision intervention: exploring paediatricians’ participation and learning

Archives of disease in childhood, 2015-04, Vol.100 (Suppl 3), p.A21-A22

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

G307(P) Does regular peer review and reflective supervision support or inhibit participation in safeguarding?

Archives of disease in childhood, 2016-04, Vol.101 (Suppl 1), p.A174-A175

Stewart, BJA

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

G449(P) To what extent did peer review scoring reflect on patient outcomes in paediatric diabetes units in England

Archives of disease in childhood, 2016-04, Vol.101 (Suppl 1), p.A267-A267

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

G447 Improvements in paediatric diabetes service and health outcomes in the north west following best practice tariff and national peer review programme

Archives of disease in childhood, 2016-04, Vol.101 (Suppl 1), p.A264-A265

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview

Postgraduate medical journal, 2017-08, Vol.93 (1102), p.499

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

G135(P) Development of Children and Young People’s Assessment Service Standards and a Supportive Peer Review Process Across a Region

Archives of disease in childhood, 2013-06, Vol.98 (Suppl 1), p.A63-A63

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer review policies in medical student journals

Postgraduate medical journal, 2018-06, Vol.94 (1112), p.362

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey

Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2007-01, Vol.61 (1), p.9-12

2007

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

P154 The improving lung cancer outcomes project: a study of the feasibility of a national reciprocal peer review and facilitated quality improvement programme

Thorax, 2011-12, Vol.66 (Suppl 4), p.A130-A130

2011

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer-reviewed and unbiased research, rather than ‘sound science’, should be used to evaluate endocrine-disrupting chemicals

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2016-11, Vol.70 (11), p.1051-1056

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Addressing conflicts of interest and clouding of objectivity: BJSM’s “Peer review: fair review” section

British journal of sports medicine, 2008-02, Vol.42 (2), p.79-79

2008

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The peer review process: a primer for JNIS readers

Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2017-07, Vol.9 (e1), p.e3

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Effect of clinical peer review on mortality in patients ventilated for more than 24 hours: a cluster randomised controlled trial

BMJ quality & safety, 2023-01, Vol.32 (1), p.17

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science

British journal of sports medicine, 2021-10, Vol.55 (19), p.1063-1064

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Streamlining review of research involving humans: Canadian models

Journal of medical genetics, 2015-08, Vol.52 (8), p.566-569

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Publication objectives and processes at the British Journal of Ophthalmology : what authors and readers need to know

British journal of ophthalmology, 2021-08, Vol.105 (8), p.1041

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Improving healthcare quality through organisational peer-to-peer assessment: lessons from the nuclear power industry

BMJ quality & safety, 2012-10, Vol.21 (10), p.872-875

2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Clinicians use courses and conversations to change practice, not journal articles: is it time for journals to peer-review courses to stay relevant?

British journal of sports medicine, 2021-06, Vol.55 (12), p.651-652

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience

Postgraduate medical journal, 2018-02, Vol.94 (1108), p.104

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Exploring new avenues to assess the sharp end of patient safety: an analysis of nationally aggregated peer review data

BMJ quality & safety, 2014-12, Vol.23 (12), p.1023-1030

2014

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Reciprocal peer review for quality improvement: an ethnographic case study of the Improving Lung Cancer Outcomes Project

BMJ quality & safety, 2012-12, Vol.21 (12), p.1034-1041

2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer review

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2007-07, Vol.24 (7), p.454-454

Hughes, Geoffrey

2007

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Critical appraisal of predatory journals in pathology

Journal of clinical pathology, 2020-01, Vol.73 (1), p.58

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Honouring top reviewers, and what makes a great peer review?

Tobacco control, 2016-01, Vol.25 (1), p.1-1

Malone, Ruth E

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

1 – 25 von 55.495

Suche als RSS-Feed

Aktive Filter

KollektionBMJ Journals Archiv - DFG Nationallizenzen

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(55.122)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(42.442)

Publikationsform

Artikel
(55.363)
Reviews
(132)

Sprache

Englisch
(55.495)
Japanisch
(5.803)
Norwegisch
(32)
Russisch
(13)
Französisch
(1)
Katalanisch
(1)

1 weiteren anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Life Sciences & Biomedicine
(49.702)
Science & Technology
(49.702)
Humans
(48.031)
Female
(25.650)
Male
(25.289)
Middle Aged
(14.951)
Adult
(14.211)
Studies
(12.254)
Aged
(10.894)
Biological And Medical Sciences
(10.836)
Medical Sciences
(10.807)
Patients
(10.265)
Mortality
(7.260)
Adolescent
(6.920)
Surgery
(6.589)
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
(6.390)
Young Adult
(6.123)
Risk Factors
(5.972)
Child
(5.725)
Pediatrics
(5.597)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Kollektion

BMJ Journals
(55.495)
Journals@Ovid Complete
(54.661)
EZB Electronic Journals Library
(51.032)
JSTOR All Journals
(7.636)
Publisher site
(6.621)
IngentaConnect Journals
(3.828)
Oxford University Press Journals Current
(1.566)
Wiley Journals
(911)
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
(705)
Sociological Abstracts
(34)
PAIS Index
(12)
IngentaConnect Journals
(5)
SpringerLINK Contemporary (Konsortium Baden-Württemberg)
(4)
EBSCOhost Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
(4)
SpringerLink
(4)
Wiley Online Library
(2)
Sage Journals
(2)
Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
(1)
EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate
(1)

14 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases
(4.162)
British Journal Of Sports Medicine
(3.852)
Heart
(3.832)
British Journal Of Ophthalmology
(3.802)
Archives Of Disease In Childhood
(3.639)
Gut
(3.291)
Journal Of Neurology, Neurosurgery And Psychiatry
(2.774)
Thorax
(2.754)
Emergency Medicine Journal : Emj
(2.671)
Journal Of Epidemiology And Community Health
(2.202)

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Neu hinzugefügt

... seit 30 Tagen
(2)
... seit 90 Tagen
(10)

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

The ethics of peer review in bioethics

G52(P) Evaluating a safeguarding peer review and reflective supervision intervention: exploring paediatricians’ participation and learning

G307(P) Does regular peer review and reflective supervision support or inhibit participation in safeguarding?

G449(P) To what extent did peer review scoring reflect on patient outcomes in paediatric diabetes units in England

G447 Improvements in paediatric diabetes service and health outcomes in the north west following best practice tariff and national peer review programme

Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview

G135(P) Development of Children and Young People’s Assessment Service Standards and a Supportive Peer Review Process Across a Region

Peer review policies in medical student journals

Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey

P154 The improving lung cancer outcomes project: a study of the feasibility of a national reciprocal peer review and facilitated quality improvement programme

Peer-reviewed and unbiased research, rather than ‘sound science’, should be used to evaluate endocrine-disrupting chemicals

Addressing conflicts of interest and clouding of objectivity: BJSM’s “Peer review: fair review” section

The peer review process: a primer for JNIS readers

Effect of clinical peer review on mortality in patients ventilated for more than 24 hours: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science

Streamlining review of research involving humans: Canadian models

Publication objectives and processes at the British Journal of Ophthalmology : what authors and readers need to know

Improving healthcare quality through organisational peer-to-peer assessment: lessons from the nuclear power industry

Clinicians use courses and conversations to change practice, not journal articles: is it time for journals to peer-review courses to stay relevant?

Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience

Exploring new avenues to assess the sharp end of patient safety: an analysis of nationally aggregated peer review data

Reciprocal peer review for quality improvement: an ethnographic case study of the Improving Lung Cancer Outcomes Project

Peer review

Critical appraisal of predatory journals in pathology

Honouring top reviewers, and what makes a great peer review?

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern