UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

Sortiert nach

Einfacher Volltextzugriff von (fast) überall

Installieren Sie die LibKey Nomad-Browsererweiterung und erhalten Sie von vielen Webseiten einfachen Zugriff auf lizenzierte Volltexte oder Open Access Publikationen. Mehr erfahren...

Psychological and pharmacological interventions for social anxiety disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

The Lancet. Psychiatry, 2014-10, Vol.1 (5), p.368-376

2014

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the MUDS study)

Research synthesis methods, 2018-03, Vol.9 (1), p.2-12

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Toward fulfilling the aspirational goal of science as self‐correcting: A call for editorial courage and diligence for error correction

European journal of clinical investigation, 2020-02, Vol.50 (2), p.e13190-n/a

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report

The American psychologist, 2018-01, Vol.73 (1), p.3-25

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Improving Transparency and Reproducibility Through Registration: The Status of Intervention Trials Published in Clinical Psychology Journals

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2016-09, Vol.84 (9), p.753-767

2016

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Studying harms of interventions with an equity lens in randomized trials

Trials, 2024-06, Vol.25 (1), p.403-5, Article 403

2024

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Reporting randomised trials of social and psychological interventions: the CONSORT-SPI 2018 Extension

Trials, 2018-07, Vol.19 (1), p.407-407, Article 407

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials

Trials, 2018-07, Vol.19 (1), p.406-406, Article 406

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Toward more rigorous and informative nutritional epidemiology: The rational space between dismissal and defense of the status quo

Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 2023, Vol.63 (18), p.3150-3167

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Opportunities for selective reporting of harms in randomized clinical trials: Selection criteria for non-systematic adverse events

Trials, 2019-09, Vol.20 (1), p.553-11, Article 553

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting

Trials, 2018-09, Vol.19 (1), p.497-497, Article 497

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Editorial Perspective: The need for new guidelines to improve the reporting of trials in child and adolescent mental health

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 2013-07, Vol.54 (7), p.810-812

2013

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

New guidelines are needed to improve the reporting of trials in addiction sciences

Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2013-09, Vol.108 (9), p.1687-1688

2013

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2022-03, Vol.143, p.186-196

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Development of a CONSORT extension for interventions in public health and related disciplines

The Lancet (British edition), 2012, Vol.380, p.S14-S14

2012

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and mortality in children from six months to five years of age

Cochrane library, 2017-03, Vol.2017 (11)

2017

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Simultaneous synthesis of treatment effects and mapping to a common scale: an alternative to standardisation

Research synthesis methods, 2015-03, Vol.6 (1), p.96-107

2015

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Harms were detected but not reported in six clinical trials of gabapentin

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2023-12, Vol.164, p.76-87

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Summaries of harms in systematic reviews are unreliable Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021-11, Vol.143, p.186-196

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Are manufacturers sharing data as promised?

BMJ (Online), 2015-09, Vol.351, p.h4169

2015

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Can non-pharmacological interventions prevent relapse in adults who have recovered from depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Clinical psychology review, 2015-07, Vol.39, p.58-70

2015

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Open Science Standards at Journals that Inform Evidence-Based Policy

Prevention science, 2023-10, Vol.24 (7), p.1275-1291

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Clearinghouse Standards of Evidence on the Transparency, Openness, and Reproducibility of Intervention Evaluations

Prevention science, 2022-07, Vol.23 (5), p.774-786

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

1 – 25 von 955

Suche als RSS-Feed

Aktive Filter

KollektionEZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(869)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(843)

Publikationsform

Sprache

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Science & Technology
(550)
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
(530)
Humans
(367)
Social Sciences
(266)
Systematic Review
(196)
Psychiatry
(191)
Psychology
(172)
Meta-Analysis
(126)
Female
(113)
Mental Health
(113)
Intervention
(103)
Male
(95)
Clinical Trials
(87)
Psychology, Clinical
(83)
Medicine
(81)
Mental Disorders
(80)
Neurosciences & Neurology
(79)
Medicine & Public Health
(77)
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
(76)
Nursing
(74)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Neu hinzugefügt

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Psychological and pharmacological interventions for social anxiety disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the MUDS study)

Toward fulfilling the aspirational goal of science as self‐correcting: A call for editorial courage and diligence for error correction

Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

Improving Transparency and Reproducibility Through Registration: The Status of Intervention Trials Published in Clinical Psychology Journals

Studying harms of interventions with an equity lens in randomized trials

Reporting randomised trials of social and psychological interventions: the CONSORT-SPI 2018 Extension

CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials

Toward more rigorous and informative nutritional epidemiology: The rational space between dismissal and defense of the status quo

Opportunities for selective reporting of harms in randomized clinical trials: Selection criteria for non-systematic adverse events

Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting

Editorial Perspective: The need for new guidelines to improve the reporting of trials in child and adolescent mental health

New guidelines are needed to improve the reporting of trials in addiction sciences

Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms

Development of a CONSORT extension for interventions in public health and related disciplines

Vitamin A supplementation for preventing morbidity and mortality in children from six months to five years of age

Simultaneous synthesis of treatment effects and mapping to a common scale: an alternative to standardisation

Harms were detected but not reported in six clinical trials of gabapentin

Summaries of harms in systematic reviews are unreliable Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms

Are manufacturers sharing data as promised?

Can non-pharmacological interventions prevent relapse in adults who have recovered from depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Open Science Standards at Journals that Inform Evidence-Based Policy

Clearinghouse Standards of Evidence on the Transparency, Openness, and Reproducibility of Intervention Evaluations

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern