UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 71

Sortiert nach

Three-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study of Dietary Bisphenol A in CD Sprague-Dawley Rats

Toxicological sciences, 2002-07, Vol.68 (1), p.121-146

2002

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment

Toxicological sciences, 2001-02, Vol.59 (2), p.198-208

2001

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Classification of skin sensitizing substances: A comparison between approaches used by the DFG-MAK Commission and the European Union legislation

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2011-10, Vol.61 (1), p.1-8

2011

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Chemical substances and contact allergy—244 substances ranked according to allergenic potency

Toxicology (Amsterdam), 2003-12, Vol.193 (3), p.219-259

2003

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Toxicity and ecotoxicity of sulfonic acids: Structure-activity relationship

Chemosphere (Oxford), 1994-06, Vol.28 (12), p.2203-2236

1994

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Skin sensitisation testing — new perspectives and recommendations

Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2001-04, Vol.39 (4), p.293-301

2001

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

When should a substance be designated as sensitizing for the skin (`Sh’) or for the airways (`Sa’)?

Human & experimental toxicology, 2002-08, Vol.21 (8), p.439-444

2002

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Designation of substances as skin sensitizing chemicals: a reply

Human & experimental toxicology, 2005-03, Vol.24 (3), p.157-159

2005

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Assessment of structurally related chemicals: Toxicity and ecotoxicity of acrylic acid and acrylic acid alkyl esters (acrylates), methacrylic acid and methacrylic acid alkyl esters (methacrylates)

Chemosphere (Oxford), 1995-07, Vol.31 (2), p.2637-2659

1995

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Joint Positive Control Testing in Guinea Pig Skin Sensitization Tests: A Harmonized Approach

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2002-02, Vol.35 (1), p.14-22

2002

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Joint Positive Control Testing in Guinea Pig Skin Sensitization Tests

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2002-02, Vol.35 (1), p.14-22

2002

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Oral acute toxic class method: a successful alternative to the oral LD50 test

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2005-06, Vol.42 (1), p.15-23

2005

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

The relevance of rechallenges and pretreatment with sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) in the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) was evaluated

Food and chemical toxicology, 1999-02, Vol.37 (2-3), p.266

1999

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

100 Bisphenol a showed no skin sensitizing or photoallergic potential in a modified local lymph node assay in mice

Toxicology letters, 2003-09, Vol.144, p.s30-s30

2003

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Oral acute toxic class method: A successful alternative to the oral LD sub(5) sub(0) test

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2005-06, Vol.42 (1), p.15-23

2005

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

One-generation reproductive toxicity study of dietary 17 beta -estradiol (E2; CAS No. 50-28-2) in CD-1 super(()R) (Swiss) mice

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 2008-02, Vol.25 (2), p.144-160

2008

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Priority setting for the evaluation of existing chemicals the approach of the German advisory committee on existing chemicals of environmental relevance (BUA)

Chemosphere (Oxford), 1993, Vol.26 (9), p.1653-1666

1993

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

"When should a substance be designated as sensitizing for the skin ("sh") or for the airways ("sa")"?

Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany), 2002-05, Vol.56 (5), p.304

2002

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Wann soll ein Arbeitsstoff als sensibilisierend für die Haut („Sh”) oder für die Atemwege („Sa”) markiert werden?

Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany), 2002, Vol.56 (5), p.304-308

2002

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

When Should A Substance Be Designated As Sensitizing For The Skin (“Sh”) Or For The Airways (“Sa”)"?

Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany), 2002-05, Vol.56 (5), p.304-308

2002

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Chemische Substanzen und Kontaktallergie – eine Bewertung von 244 Substanzen

Dermatologie in Beruf und Umwelt = Occupational and environmental dermatology, 2004-10, Vol.52 (10), p.146-163

2004

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Chemical Substances and Contact Allergy-244 Substances Ranked According to Allergenic Potency

ChemInform, 2004-05, Vol.35 (18), p.no-no

2004

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Exploring the impact of data curation criteria on the observed geographical distribution of mosses

Ecology and evolution, 2023-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e10786-n/a

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Compositional response of Amazon forests to climate change

Global change biology, 2019-01, Vol.25 (1), p.39-56

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests

Global ecology and biogeography, 2015-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1314-1328

2015

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

1 – 25 von 71

Suche als RSS-Feed

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(64)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(67)

Publikationsform

Artikel
(70)
Buchkapitel
(1)

Sprache

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

Global Ecology And Biogeography
(6)
Regulatory Toxicology And Pharmacology
(5)
Chemosphere
(4)
Global Change Biology
(4)
Toxicological Sciences
(4)
Cancer Research
(3)
Der Pathologe
(3)
Pneumologie
(3)
Reproductive Toxicology
(3)
Science
(3)

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Three-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study of Dietary Bisphenol A in CD Sprague-Dawley Rats

Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment

Classification of skin sensitizing substances: A comparison between approaches used by the DFG-MAK Commission and the European Union legislation

Chemical substances and contact allergy—244 substances ranked according to allergenic potency

Toxicity and ecotoxicity of sulfonic acids: Structure-activity relationship

Skin sensitisation testing — new perspectives and recommendations

When should a substance be designated as sensitizing for the skin (`Sh’) or for the airways (`Sa’)?

Designation of substances as skin sensitizing chemicals: a reply

Assessment of structurally related chemicals: Toxicity and ecotoxicity of acrylic acid and acrylic acid alkyl esters (acrylates), methacrylic acid and methacrylic acid alkyl esters (methacrylates)

Joint Positive Control Testing in Guinea Pig Skin Sensitization Tests: A Harmonized Approach

Joint Positive Control Testing in Guinea Pig Skin Sensitization Tests

Oral acute toxic class method: a successful alternative to the oral LD50 test

The relevance of rechallenges and pretreatment with sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) in the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) was evaluated

100 Bisphenol a showed no skin sensitizing or photoallergic potential in a modified local lymph node assay in mice

Oral acute toxic class method: A successful alternative to the oral LD sub(5) sub(0) test

One-generation reproductive toxicity study of dietary 17 beta -estradiol (E2; CAS No. 50-28-2) in CD-1 super(()R) (Swiss) mice

Priority setting for the evaluation of existing chemicals the approach of the German advisory committee on existing chemicals of environmental relevance (BUA)

"When should a substance be designated as sensitizing for the skin ("sh") or for the airways ("sa")"?

Wann soll ein Arbeitsstoff als sensibilisierend für die Haut („Sh”) oder für die Atemwege („Sa”) markiert werden?

When Should A Substance Be Designated As Sensitizing For The Skin (“Sh”) Or For The Airways (“Sa”)"?

Chemische Substanzen und Kontaktallergie – eine Bewertung von 244 Substanzen

Chemical Substances and Contact Allergy-244 Substances Ranked According to Allergenic Potency

Exploring the impact of data curation criteria on the observed geographical distribution of mosses

Compositional response of Amazon forests to climate change

Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests

Suchergebnisse filtern