UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 45

Sortiert nach

THE NEED FOR A RESEARCH CULTURE IN THE FORENSIC SCIENCES

UCLA law review, 2011-02, Vol.58 (3), p.725

2011

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Sequential Unmasking: A Means of Minimizing Observer Effects in Forensic DNA Interpretation

Journal of forensic sciences, 2008-07, Vol.53 (4), p.1006-1007

2008

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Reservations about likelihood ratios (and some other aspects of forensic 'Bayesianism')

Law, probability and risk, 2013-03, Vol.12 (1), p.63-73

Michael Risinger, D.

2013

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Wolves and Sheep, Predators and Scavengers, or Why I Left Civil Procedure (Not With a Bang, but a Whimper)

UCLA law review, 2013-08, Vol.60 (6), p.1620

Risinger, D Michael

2013

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion

California law review, 2002-01, Vol.90 (1), p.1-56

2002

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Innocents Convicted: An Empirically Justified Factual Wrongful Conviction Rate

The journal of criminal law & criminology, 2007-01, Vol.97 (3), p.761-806

Risinger, D. Michael

2007

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Regarding Champod, editorial: “Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science”

Science & justice, 2014-12, Vol.54 (6), p.508-509

2014

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Commentary on: Thornton JI. Letter to the editor-a rejection of "working blind" as a cure for contextual bias. J Forensic Sci 2010;55(6):1663

Journal of forensic sciences, 2011-03, Vol.56 (2), p.562-563

2011

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

A House with No Foundation

Issues in science and technology, 2003-10, Vol.20 (1), p.35-39

2003

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

THE NAS/NRC REPORT ON FORENSIC SCIENCE: A GLASS NINE-TENTHS FULL (THIS IS ABOUT THE OTHER TENTH)

Jurimetrics (Chicago, Ill.), 2009-09, Vol.50 (1), p.21-34

Risinger, D. Michael

2009

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

A tribute to Peter Tillers1

Law, probability and risk, 2017-03, Vol.16 (1), p.5-6

Michael Risinger, D.

2017

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Commentary on: Budowle B, Bottrell MC, Bunch SG, Fram R, Harrison D, Meagher S, Oien CT, Peterson PE, Seiger DP,Smith MB, Smrz MA, Soltis GL, Stacey RB. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):798-809

Journal of forensic sciences, 2010-01, Vol.55 (1), p.273-4; author reply 275-6

2010

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

At What Cost? Blind Testing, Eyewitness Identification, and What Can and Cannot Be Counted as a Cost of Reducing Information Available for Decision

Howard law journal, 2015-01, Vol.58 (2), p.333

Risinger, D Michael

2015

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Against symbolization

Law, probability and risk, 2012-06, Vol.11 (2-3), p.247-253

Risinger, D. Michael

2012

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Context effects in forensic science

Science & justice, 2004-04, Vol.44 (2), p.119-119

2004

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Whose fault? - Daubert, the NAS report, and the notion of error in forensic science

The Fordham urban law journal, 2010-12, Vol.38 (2), p.519

Risinger, D. Michael

2010

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Exorcism of Ignorance as a Proxy for Rational Knowledge: The Lessons of Handwriting Identification "Expertise"

University of Pennsylvania law review, 1989-01, Vol.137 (3), p.731-792

1989

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Commentary on: Budowle B, Bottrell MC, Bunch SG, Fram R, Harrison D, Meagher S, Oien CT, Peterson PE, Seiger DP,Smith MB, Smrz MA, Soltis GL, Stacey RB. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):798-809-DAN E. KRANE, SIMON FORD,JASON R. GILDER, KEITH INMAN, ALLAN JAMIESON, ROGER KOPPL, IRVING L. KORNFIELD, D. MICHAEL RISINGER, NORAH RUDIN, MARC SCOTT TAYLOR, AND WILLIAM C. THOMPSON

Journal of forensic sciences, 2010-01, Vol.55 (1), p.273-274

2010

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Authors’ Response

Journal of forensic sciences, 2009-11, Vol.54 (6), p.1500-1501

2009

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Authors’ Response

Journal of forensic sciences, 2009-11, Vol.54 (6), p.1500-1501

2009

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Authors' Response

Journal of forensic sciences, 2009-11, Vol.54 (6), p.1500-1501

2009

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Authors' Response

Journal of forensic sciences, 2009-03, Vol.54 (2), p.501-501

2009

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Authors’ Response

Journal of forensic sciences, 2009-03, Vol.54 (2), p.501-501

2009

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Authors’ Response

Journal of forensic sciences, 2009-03, Vol.54 (2), p.501-501

2009

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

1 – 25 von 45

Suche als RSS-Feed

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(36)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(41)

Publikationsform

Sprache

Englisch
(45)
Japanisch
(2)

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

THE NEED FOR A RESEARCH CULTURE IN THE FORENSIC SCIENCES

Sequential Unmasking: A Means of Minimizing Observer Effects in Forensic DNA Interpretation

Reservations about likelihood ratios (and some other aspects of forensic 'Bayesianism')

Wolves and Sheep, Predators and Scavengers, or Why I Left Civil Procedure (Not With a Bang, but a Whimper)

The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion

Innocents Convicted: An Empirically Justified Factual Wrongful Conviction Rate

Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims

Regarding Champod, editorial: “Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science”

Commentary on: Thornton JI. Letter to the editor-a rejection of "working blind" as a cure for contextual bias. J Forensic Sci 2010;55(6):1663

A House with No Foundation

THE NAS/NRC REPORT ON FORENSIC SCIENCE: A GLASS NINE-TENTHS FULL (THIS IS ABOUT THE OTHER TENTH)

A tribute to Peter Tillers1

At What Cost? Blind Testing, Eyewitness Identification, and What Can and Cannot Be Counted as a Cost of Reducing Information Available for Decision

Against symbolization

Context effects in forensic science

Whose fault? - Daubert, the NAS report, and the notion of error in forensic science

Exorcism of Ignorance as a Proxy for Rational Knowledge: The Lessons of Handwriting Identification "Expertise"

Authors’ Response

Authors’ Response

Authors' Response

Authors' Response

Authors’ Response

Authors’ Response

Suchergebnisse filtern