UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 58

Sortiert nach

Structure peer review to make it more robust

Nature (London), 2024-04, Vol.628 (8008), p.476-483

Malicki, Mario

2024

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Extent, Awareness and Perception of Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: An Explorative Survey

PloS one, 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0159290-e0159290

2016

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017

Nature communications, 2021-10, Vol.12 (1), p.5840-5840, Article 5840

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines

PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0270054-e0270054

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Preprint Servers' Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations

JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2020-11, Vol.324 (18), p.1901

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Journals' instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines

PloS one, 2019-09, Vol.14 (9), p.e0222157-e0222157

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Is there a solution to publication bias? Researchers call for changes in dissemination of clinical research results

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2014-10, Vol.67 (10), p.1103-1110

2014

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Frequency and format of clinical trial results dissemination to patients: a survey of authors of trials indexed in PubMed

BMJ open, 2019-10, Vol.9 (10), p.e032701-e032701

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Honorary authorship is highly prevalent in health sciences: systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys

Scientific reports, 2024-02, Vol.14 (1), p.4385-15, Article 4385

2024

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

No difference in knowledge obtained from infographic or plain language summary of a Cochrane systematic review: three randomized controlled trials

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018-05, Vol.97, p.86-94

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Automatically listing senior members of departments as co-authors is highly prevalent in health sciences: meta-analysis of survey research

Scientific reports, 2024-03, Vol.14 (1), p.5883-12, Article 5883

2024

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review—A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists

PloS one, 2021-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e0244529-e0244529

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Automatic recognition of self-acknowledged limitations in clinical research literature

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018-07, Vol.25 (7), p.855-861

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Analysis of single comments left for bioRxiv preprints till September 2019

Biochemia Medica, 2021-06, Vol.31 (2), p.020201-184

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Toward assessing clinical trial publications for reporting transparency

Journal of biomedical informatics, 2021-04, Vol.116, p.103717-103717, Article 103717

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Research rigor and reproducibility in research education: A CTSA institutional survey

Journal of clinical and translational science, 2024, Vol.8 (1), p.e45-e45, Article e45

2024

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Predictors of academic success and aspirations in secondary nursing education: A cross-sectional study in Croatia

Nurse education today, 2020-05, Vol.88, p.104370-104370, Article 104370

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Honorary authorship in health sciences: a protocol for a systematic review of survey research

Systematic reviews, 2022-04, Vol.11 (1), p.57-57, Article 57

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Predictors of academic progression and desire to continue education for undergraduate and graduate nursing students: Cross-sectional study and a nested follow-up study

Nurse education today, 2022-04, Vol.111, p.105274-105274, Article 105274

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Statistical Guidance to Authors at Top-Ranked Journals across Scientific Disciplines

The American statistician, 2023-07, Vol.77 (3), p.239-247

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

How to choose an evidence-based medicine knowledge test for medical students? Comparison of three knowledge measures

BMC medical education, 2018-12, Vol.18 (1), p.290-290, Article 290

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Perceptions of Ethical Climate and Research Pressures in Different Faculties of a University: Cross-Sectional Study at the University of Split, Croatia

Science and engineering ethics, 2019-02, Vol.25 (1), p.231-245

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Is the quality of reviews reflected in editors' and authors' satisfaction with peer review? A cross‐sectional study in 12 journals across four research fields

Learned publishing, 2021-04, Vol.34 (2), p.187-197

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Study design, publication outcome, and funding of research presented at international congresses on peer review and biomedical publication

JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2014-03, Vol.311 (10), p.1065

2014

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

1 – 25 von 58

Suche als RSS-Feed

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(55)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(51)

Publikationsform

Artikel
(58)

Sprache

Englisch
(58)
Japanisch
(2)

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Science & Technology
(43)
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
(29)
Humans
(27)
General & Internal Medicine
(13)
Medicine, General & Internal
(13)
Science & Technology - Other Topics
(12)
Multidisciplinary Sciences
(11)
Social Sciences
(11)
Croatia
(9)
Cross-Sectional Studies
(9)
Female
(9)
Surveys
(9)
Surveys And Questionnaires
(9)
Systematic Review
(9)
Authorship
(8)
Ethics
(8)
Male
(8)
Medical Research
(8)
Peer Review
(8)
Clinical Trials
(7)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Structure peer review to make it more robust

Extent, Awareness and Perception of Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: An Explorative Survey

Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017

Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines

Preprint Servers' Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations

Journals' instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines

Is there a solution to publication bias? Researchers call for changes in dissemination of clinical research results

A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science

Frequency and format of clinical trial results dissemination to patients: a survey of authors of trials indexed in PubMed

Honorary authorship is highly prevalent in health sciences: systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys

No difference in knowledge obtained from infographic or plain language summary of a Cochrane systematic review: three randomized controlled trials

Automatically listing senior members of departments as co-authors is highly prevalent in health sciences: meta-analysis of survey research

Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review—A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists

Automatic recognition of self-acknowledged limitations in clinical research literature

Analysis of single comments left for bioRxiv preprints till September 2019

Toward assessing clinical trial publications for reporting transparency

Research rigor and reproducibility in research education: A CTSA institutional survey

Predictors of academic success and aspirations in secondary nursing education: A cross-sectional study in Croatia

Honorary authorship in health sciences: a protocol for a systematic review of survey research

Predictors of academic progression and desire to continue education for undergraduate and graduate nursing students: Cross-sectional study and a nested follow-up study

Statistical Guidance to Authors at Top-Ranked Journals across Scientific Disciplines

How to choose an evidence-based medicine knowledge test for medical students? Comparison of three knowledge measures

Perceptions of Ethical Climate and Research Pressures in Different Faculties of a University: Cross-Sectional Study at the University of Split, Croatia

Is the quality of reviews reflected in editors' and authors' satisfaction with peer review? A cross‐sectional study in 12 journals across four research fields

Study design, publication outcome, and funding of research presented at international congresses on peer review and biomedical publication

Suchergebnisse filtern