UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

Sortiert nach

Einfacher Volltextzugriff von (fast) überall

Installieren Sie die LibKey Nomad-Browsererweiterung und erhalten Sie von vielen Webseiten einfachen Zugriff auf lizenzierte Volltexte oder Open Access Publikationen. Mehr erfahren...

Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer review

eLife, 2020-11, Vol.9

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

How often do cancer researchers make their data and code available and what factors are associated with sharing?

BMC medicine, 2022-11, Vol.20 (1), p.438-12, Article 438

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process

BMC research notes, 2022-04, Vol.15 (1), p.127-7, Article 127

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening and diagnosis rates: A rapid review and meta-analysis

Journal of medical screening, 2022-12, Vol.29 (4), p.209-218

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence

Systematic reviews, 2021-04, Vol.10 (1), p.112-13, Article 112

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Predicting and reasoning about replicability using structured groups

Royal Society open science, 2023-06, Vol.10 (6), p.221553-221553

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Prevalence and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data

BMJ (Online), 2023-07, Vol.382, p.e075767

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

F1000 research, 2021, Vol.10, p.491-491

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Data and code availability statements in systematic reviews of interventions were often missing or inaccurate: a content analysis

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2022-07, Vol.147, p.1-10

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study

BMJ (Online), 2022-11, Vol.379, p.e072428

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Rehabilitation for Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Early, Unrestricted Exercise Programs on Upper Limb Function

Clinical breast cancer, 2022-10, Vol.22 (7), p.650-665

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

What do Australians affected by cancer think about oncology researchers sharing research data? A cross‐sectional survey

Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2024-08, Vol.20 (4), p.522-530

2024

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Cancer researchers' experiences with and perceptions of research data sharing: Results of a cross-sectional survey

Accountability in research, 2024-02, p.1-28

2024

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Attitudes of people living with cancer towards trial non-publication and research participation

BMJ evidence-based medicine, 2024-02, Vol.29 (1), p.64-66

2024

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Comparison between electromagnetic transponders and radiographic imaging for prostate localization: A pelvic phantom study with rotations and translations

Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2017-09, Vol.18 (5), p.43-53

2017

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]

F1000 research, 2021, Vol.10, p.491

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Responsibilities for receiving and using individual participant data

Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods, 2023-11, Vol.1 (9), p.n/a

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Systematic reviewers' perspectives on sharing review data, analytic code, and other materials: A survey

Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods, 2023-04, Vol.1 (2), p.n/a

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Systematic reviewers' perspectives on replication of systematic reviews: A survey

Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods, 2023-04, Vol.1 (2), p.n/a

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

The use of probiotics versus psyllium husk as a bowel preparation for prostate radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis

Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2015-12, Vol.14 (4), p.378-384

2015

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Age-specific global epidemiology of hydrocephalus: Systematic review, metanalysis and global birth surveillance

PloS one, 2018-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e0204926-e0204926

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases

Nature methods, 2009-05, Vol.6 (5), p.343-345

2009

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

1 – 25 von 911

Suche als RSS-Feed

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(776)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(769)

Publikationsform

3 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Sprache

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Science & Technology
(507)
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
(361)
Humans
(254)
Female
(146)
Male
(143)
Physical Sciences
(117)
Physics
(110)
Biological And Medical Sciences
(84)
Middle Aged
(84)
Adult
(80)
Neurosciences & Neurology
(72)
Animals
(69)
Medical Sciences
(69)
Aged
(68)
Experiment
(63)
Particle Physics
(63)
Clinical Neurology
(59)
High Energy Physics - Experiment
(53)
Surgery
(48)
Science & Technology - Other Topics
(40)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Neu hinzugefügt

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer review

How often do cancer researchers make their data and code available and what factors are associated with sharing?

Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with the repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) process

Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process

Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening and diagnosis rates: A rapid review and meta-analysis

The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence

Predicting and reasoning about replicability using structured groups

Prevalence and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data

Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Data and code availability statements in systematic reviews of interventions were often missing or inaccurate: a content analysis

Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study

Rehabilitation for Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Early, Unrestricted Exercise Programs on Upper Limb Function

What do Australians affected by cancer think about oncology researchers sharing research data? A cross‐sectional survey

Cancer researchers' experiences with and perceptions of research data sharing: Results of a cross-sectional survey

Attitudes of people living with cancer towards trial non-publication and research participation

Comparison between electromagnetic transponders and radiographic imaging for prostate localization: A pelvic phantom study with rotations and translations

Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]

Responsibilities for receiving and using individual participant data

Systematic reviewers' perspectives on sharing review data, analytic code, and other materials: A survey

Systematic reviewers' perspectives on replication of systematic reviews: A survey

The use of probiotics versus psyllium husk as a bowel preparation for prostate radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis

Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with the repliCATS

Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with the repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) process

Age-specific global epidemiology of hydrocephalus: Systematic review, metanalysis and global birth surveillance

Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases

Suchergebnisse filtern