UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 786

Sortiert nach

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

PloS one, 2019-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e0225980-e0225980

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey

PloS one, 2016-01, Vol.11 (1), p.e0146444-e0146444

2016

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps

PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0168403-e0168403

2016

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

PloS one, 2018-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e0209869-e0209869

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries

PloS one, 2018-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e0190695-e0190695

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Indirect treatment comparisons: Choosing the right tool for the job

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2022-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1180-1181

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Threshold effects of extreme weather events on cereal yields in India

Climatic change, 2021-03, Vol.165 (1-2), Article 26

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Online retail returns management: Integration within an omni-channel distribution context

International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 2016-07, Vol.46 (6/7), p.584-605

2016

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Dabigatran adherence in atrial fibrillation patients during the first year after diagnosis: a nationwide cohort study

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis, 2015-04, Vol.13 (4), p.495-504

2015

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Independent screening for single-index hazard rate models with ultrahigh dimensional features

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology, 2013-03, Vol.75 (2), p.217-245

2013

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Long-term Glycemic Variability and Risk of Adverse Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Diabetes care, 2015-12, Vol.38 (12), p.2354-2369

2015

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Restarting Anticoagulant Treatment After Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and the Impact on Recurrent Stroke, Mortality, and Bleeding: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2015-08, Vol.132 (6), p.517-525

2015

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

An indirect treatment comparison of the efficacy of semaglutide 1.0 mg versus dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2021-11, Vol.23 (11), p.2513-2520

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement

PLoS medicine, 2016-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e1002148-e1002148

2016

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Rivaroxaban versus warfarin and dabigatran in atrial fibrillation: comparative effectiveness and safety in Danish routine care

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2016-11, Vol.25 (11), p.1236-1244

2016

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Crop productivity and adaptation to climate change in Pakistan

Environment and development economics, 2018-12, Vol.23 (6), p.679-701

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

More than half of systematic reviews have relevant core outcome sets

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021-08, Vol.136, p.168-179

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

PloS one, 2021, Vol.16 (1), p.e0244878-e0244878

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0

Trials, 2017-06, Vol.18 (Suppl 3), p.280-50, Article 280

2017

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Patient participation impacts outcome domain selection in core outcome sets for research: an updated systematic review

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2023-06, Vol.158, p.127-133

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review

BMJ open, 2020-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e036562-e036562

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

The effect of basal–bolus therapy varies with baseline 1,5‐anhydroglucitol level in people with Type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis

Diabetic medicine, 2018-09, Vol.35 (9), p.1273-1278

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Patient-reported outcome measures in core outcome sets targeted overlapping domains but through different instruments

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021-08, Vol.136, p.26-36

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement

Trials, 2019-02, Vol.20 (1), p.116-116, Article 116

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Inclusion of participants from low-income and middle-income countries in core outcome sets development: a systematic review

BMJ open, 2021-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e049981-e049981

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

1 – 25 von 786

Suche als RSS-Feed

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(369)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(455)

Publikationsform

3 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Sprache

1 weiteren anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Science & Technology
(189)
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
(153)
Humans
(140)
Exact Sciences And Technology
(132)
Energy
(131)
Applied Sciences
(130)
Energy Economics
(123)
General, Economic And Professional Studies
(119)
Economic Data
(117)
Fossil Fuels And Derived Products
(110)
Male
(77)
Oil
(76)
Female
(71)
Petroleum Industry
(71)
Biological And Medical Sciences
(61)
Middle Aged
(52)
Gas
(48)
Adult
(43)
Medical Sciences
(42)
Aged
(41)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Neu hinzugefügt

... seit 30 Tagen
(1)
... seit 90 Tagen
(4)

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries

Indirect treatment comparisons: Choosing the right tool for the job

Threshold effects of extreme weather events on cereal yields in India

Online retail returns management: Integration within an omni-channel distribution context

Dabigatran adherence in atrial fibrillation patients during the first year after diagnosis: a nationwide cohort study

Independent screening for single-index hazard rate models with ultrahigh dimensional features

Long-term Glycemic Variability and Risk of Adverse Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Restarting Anticoagulant Treatment After Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and the Impact on Recurrent Stroke, Mortality, and Bleeding: A Nationwide Cohort Study

An indirect treatment comparison of the efficacy of semaglutide 1.0 mg versus dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement

Rivaroxaban versus warfarin and dabigatran in atrial fibrillation: comparative effectiveness and safety in Danish routine care

Crop productivity and adaptation to climate change in Pakistan

More than half of systematic reviews have relevant core outcome sets

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0

Patient participation impacts outcome domain selection in core outcome sets for research: an updated systematic review

Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review

The effect of basal–bolus therapy varies with baseline 1,5‐anhydroglucitol level in people with Type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis

Patient-reported outcome measures in core outcome sets targeted overlapping domains but through different instruments

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement

Inclusion of participants from low-income and middle-income countries in core outcome sets development: a systematic review

Suchergebnisse filtern