UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 100

Sortiert nach

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 2020-07, Vol.83 (13-14), p.485-494

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

The institute of medicine report on smoking: A blueprint for a renewed public health policy

American journal of public health (1971), 2002-06, Vol.92 (6), p.945-946

BATTA GORI, Gio

2002

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Dimensional errors of metaphorical measurements. Can they be resolved?

International journal of epidemiology, 2006-12, Vol.35 (6), p.1590-1592

Gori, Gio Batta

2006

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

An appeal for the integrity of science and public policy

Toxicology (Amsterdam), 2016-09, Vol.371, p.1-11

2016

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Metaphorical measurements and theories

International journal of epidemiology, 2007-08, Vol.36 (4), p.931-932

Gori, Gio Batta

2007

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Deepening uncertainty on how the EU may regulate supposable endocrine disruptors

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2016-11, Vol.81, p.8-9

2016

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Regulatory Forum Opinion Piece: Long-term Animal Bioassays: Is the End Near?

Toxicologic pathology, 2013-07, Vol.41 (5), p.805-807

Gori, Gio Batta

2013

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles

ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation, 2013, Vol.30 (3), p.381-385

2013

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Animals and ethical research

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2014-12, Vol.70 (3), p.575-576

Gori, Gio Batta

2014

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Elusive reproducibility

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2014-08, Vol.69 (3), p.279-280

Gori, Gio Batta

2014

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Health and environment regulation: Ethical standards of evidence

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2013-06, Vol.66 (1), p.163-165

Gori, Gio Batta

2013

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Stoking the Rigged Terror of Secondhand Smoke

Regulation (Washington. 1977), 2007-04, Vol.30 (1), p.14-17

Gori, Gio Batta

2007

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Financial interests are not the only bias factor

Nature (London), 2001-10, Vol.413 (6856), p.565-565

Gori, Gio Batta

2001

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Corrigendum to “Critique of the “Comment” etitled “Pyrethroid exposure: not so harmless after all” by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology”

Toxicology letters, 2021-08, Vol.346, p.57-57

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Critique of the “Comment” etitled “Pyrethroid exposure: Not so harmless after all” by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology

Toxicology letters, 2021-04, Vol.340, p.1-3

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Chemico-biological interactions, 2020-08, Vol.326, p.109099, Article 109099

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity: how to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Archives of toxicology, 2020-07, Vol.94 (7), p.2549-2557

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Food and chemical toxicology, 2020-08, Vol.142, p.111349, Article 111349

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Principles of Pharmacology and Toxicology Also Govern Effects of Chemicals on the Endocrine System

Toxicological sciences, 2015-07, Vol.146 (1), p.11-15

2015

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Toxicology in vitro, 2020-09, Vol.67, p.104861, Article 104861

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability: in support of the BfR position

Archives of toxicology, 2021-09, Vol.95 (9), p.3133-3136

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles

Food and chemical toxicology, 2013-12, Vol.62, p.A1

2013

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

WITHDRAWN: Conflict of interest and public policy

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2009-02

Batta Gori, Gio

2009

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Response to “The Path Forward on Endocrine Disruptors Requires Focus”

Toxicological sciences, 2016-02, Vol.149 (2), p.273-274

2016

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

1 – 25 von 100

Suche als RSS-Feed

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(93)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(99)

Publikationsform

Artikel
(98)
magazinearticle
(2)

Sprache

Englisch
(100)
Japanisch
(1)

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Science & Technology
(65)
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
(57)
Humans
(53)
Toxicology
(39)
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
(27)
Risk Assessment
(21)
Animals
(20)
Legal Medicine
(20)
Medicine, Legal
(20)
United States
(13)
Biological And Medical Sciences
(12)
Epidemiology
(12)
Medical Sciences
(12)
Endocrine Disruptors - Toxicity
(11)
Public Health
(9)
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
(9)
Environmental Exposure
(8)
Letters
(8)
Multidisciplinary Sciences
(8)
Risk Factors
(8)

15 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

The institute of medicine report on smoking: A blueprint for a renewed public health policy

Dimensional errors of metaphorical measurements. Can they be resolved?

An appeal for the integrity of science and public policy

Metaphorical measurements and theories

Deepening uncertainty on how the EU may regulate supposable endocrine disruptors

Regulatory Forum Opinion Piece: Long-term Animal Bioassays: Is the End Near?

Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles

Animals and ethical research

Elusive reproducibility

Health and environment regulation: Ethical standards of evidence

Stoking the Rigged Terror of Secondhand Smoke

Financial interests are not the only bias factor

Corrigendum to “Critique of the “Comment” etitled “Pyrethroid exposure: not so harmless after all” by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology”

Critique of the “Comment” etitled “Pyrethroid exposure: Not so harmless after all” by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity: how to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

Principles of Pharmacology and Toxicology Also Govern Effects of Chemicals on the Endocrine System

Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?

The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability: in support of the BfR position

Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission's recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles

WITHDRAWN: Conflict of interest and public policy

Response to “The Path Forward on Endocrine Disruptors Requires Focus”

Suchergebnisse filtern