UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 80

Sortiert nach

Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018-01, Vol.93, p.36-44

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2017-07, Vol.87, p.4-13

2017

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019-07, Vol.111, p.83-93

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

GRADE Guidance 34: update on rating imprecision using a minimally contextualized approach

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2022-10, Vol.150, p.216-224

2022

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies—from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019-07, Vol.111, p.69-82

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Addressing continuous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2013-09, Vol.66 (9), p.1014-1021.e1

2013

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis: paper 2: real-world case examples from GRADE for when a reference standard is not clearly defined/ easily replicable or when it is infeasible/ unethical to perform the reference standard

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2023-02, Vol.154, p.206-207

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019-07, Vol.111, p.105-114

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological Survey

Clinical epidemiology, 2020-01, Vol.12, p.527-535

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

GRADE Evidence to Decision Frameworks for adoption, adaptation and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2017-01, Vol.81, p.101-110

2017

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis paper 4: response to reed

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2023-02, Vol.154, p.218-218

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

GRADE guidelines 33: Addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021-11, Vol.139, p.49-56

2021

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—Risk of bias and indirectness

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019-07, Vol.111, p.94-104

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019-04, Vol.108, p.77-85

2019

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Prospective collaborative recommendation development: a novel model for more timely and trustworthy guidelines

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2023-10, Vol.162, p.156-159

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016-04, Vol.72, p.45-55

2016

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

GRADE guidelines 27: how to calculate absolute effects for time-to-event outcomes in summary of findings tables and Evidence Profiles

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2020-02, Vol.118, p.124-131

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) notes: extremely serious, GRADE's terminology for rating down by three levels

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2020-04, Vol.120, p.116-120

2020

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

GRADE guidelines 17: Assessing the Risk of Bias Associated with Missing Participant Outcome Data in a body of evidence

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2017-07, Vol.87, p.14-22

2017

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation concept article 5: addressing intransitivity in a network meta-analysis

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2023-08, Vol.160, p.151-159

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

The development methods of official GRADE articles and requirements for claiming the use of GRADE – A statement by the GRADE guidance group

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2023-07, Vol.159, p.79-84

2023

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Marcos GRADE de la evidencia a la decisión (EtD): un enfoque sistemático y transparente para tomar decisiones sanitarias bien informadas. 1: Introducción

Gaceta sanitaria, 2018-03, Vol.32 (2), p.166.e1-166.e10

2018

Volltextzugriff (PDF)

1 – 25 von 80

Suche als RSS-Feed

Aktive Filter

ThemaPublic, Environmental & Occupational Health

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(80)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(79)

Publikationsform

Artikel
(80)

Sprache

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

14 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Neu hinzugefügt

... seit 90 Tagen
(1)

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis

The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence

GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains

GRADE Guidance 34: update on rating imprecision using a minimally contextualized approach

GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies—from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations

The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses

Addressing continuous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers

Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis: paper 2: real-world case examples from GRADE for when a reference standard is not clearly defined/ easily replicable or when it is infeasible/ unethical to perform the reference standard

GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence

Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological Survey

GRADE Evidence to Decision Frameworks for adoption, adaptation and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT

Challenges with need to improve the reference standard in diagnosis paper 4: response to reed

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

GRADE guidelines 33: Addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis

GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—Risk of bias and indirectness

GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence

Prospective collaborative recommendation development: a novel model for more timely and trustworthy guidelines

A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach

GRADE guidelines 27: how to calculate absolute effects for time-to-event outcomes in summary of findings tables and Evidence Profiles

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) notes: extremely serious, GRADE's terminology for rating down by three levels

GRADE guidelines 17: Assessing the Risk of Bias Associated with Missing Participant Outcome Data in a body of evidence

Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation concept article 5: addressing intransitivity in a network meta-analysis

The development methods of official GRADE articles and requirements for claiming the use of GRADE – A statement by the GRADE guidance group

Marcos GRADE de la evidencia a la decisión (EtD): un enfoque sistemático y transparente para tomar decisiones sanitarias bien informadas. 1: Introducción

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern