UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 37.843

Sortiert nach

PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016-07, Vol.75, p.40-46

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer review

eLife, 2020-11, Vol.9

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Improving the Efficiency of Grant and Journal Peer Review: Registered Reports Funding

Nicotine & tobacco research, 2017-07, Vol.19 (7), p.773-773

Munafò, Marcus R.

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A Medical Record Peer-Review System to Evaluate Residents’ Clinical Competence: Criterion Validity Analysis

The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2019, Vol.248(4), pp.253-260

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors

Rheumatology international, 2011-11, Vol.31 (11), p.1409-1417

2011

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada

Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 2018-04, Vol.190 (16), p.E489

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences

American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2014-12, Vol.78 (10), p.176-176, Article 176

Bowman, John D.

2014

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2009-09, Vol.62 (9), p.944-952

2009

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Big Data and Complex Data Analytics: Breaking Peer Review?

Journal of dental research, 2022-04, Vol.101 (4), p.369-370

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills

Journal of Korean Medical Science, 2021, 36(24), , pp.1-7

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Assessing doctors’ competencies using multisource feedback: validating a Japanese version of the Sheffield Peer Review Assessment Tool (SPRAT)

BMJ open, 2015-06, Vol.5 (6), p.e007135-e007135

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective

PLoS biology, 2019-02, Vol.17 (2), p.e3000151-e3000151

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Recommendations for Pathology Peer Review

Toxicologic Pathology, 2010-12, Vol.38 (7), p.1118-1127

2010

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The Evolution of the Journal Club: From Osler to Twitter

American journal of kidney diseases, 2017-06, Vol.69 (6), p.827-836

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis

mBio, 2019-06, Vol.10 (3)

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models

BMJ open, 2015-09, Vol.5 (9), p.e008707-e008707

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Stem cell clinics online: the direct-to-consumer portrayal of stem cell medicine

Cell stem cell, 2008-12, Vol.3 (6), p.591-594

2008

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis

BMJ (Online), 2012-01, Vol.344 (7838), p.d7292

International edition, 2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Characteristics of scholars who review for predatory and legitimate journals: linkage study of Cabells Scholarly Analytics and Publons data

BMJ open, 2021-07, Vol.11 (7), p.e050270-e050270

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery

PLoS biology, 2020-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e3000690-e3000690

Dirnagl, Ulrich

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey

BMJ open, 2019-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e026516-e026516

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques

Journal of women's health (Larchmont, N.Y. 2002), 2017-05, Vol.26 (5), p.560

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting

BMJ open, 2020-12, Vol.10 (12), p.e041849-e041849

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine

Annals of internal medicine, 1994-07, Vol.121 (1), p.11

1994

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting

BMC medical research methodology, 2018-06, Vol.18 (1), p.56-56, Article 56

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

1 – 25 von 37.843

Suche als RSS-Feed

Aktive Filter

KollektionWiley Online Library All Journals

KollektioneBooks on EBSCOhost

Zeitschrift / SeriePlos One

SpracheLitauisch

SpracheJapanisch

ThemaLife Sciences & Biomedicine

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(36.584)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(32.750)

Publikationsform

Sprache

8 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Science & Technology
(37.843)
Humans
(25.526)
Female
(12.204)
Male
(11.240)
Adult
(6.724)
Middle Aged
(6.040)
Biological And Medical Sciences
(5.735)
Aged
(4.966)
Medical Sciences
(4.904)
Risk Factors
(4.239)
Studies
(4.189)
Animals
(4.169)
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
(4.042)
General & Internal Medicine
(3.826)
Adolescent
(3.814)
Review
(3.732)
Neurosciences & Neurology
(3.606)
Medicine, General & Internal
(3.543)
Systematic Review
(3.467)

14 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Kollektion

MEDLINE
(28.325)
EZB Electronic Journals Library
(22.813)
Ingenta E-Journals
(16.685)
WK Lippincott Williams & Wilkins–Connect here FIRST to enable access
(14.904)
IngentaConnect Journals
(10.600)
BMJ
(8.575)
Springer journals
(5.976)
BMJ Journals Archiv - DFG Nationallizenzen
(5.857)
NUS Single-Journal Subscriptions
(5.425)
Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
(5.396)
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect (DFG Nationallizenzen)
(3.543)
SpringerLINK Contemporary (Konsortium Baden-Württemberg)
(2.718)
JSTOR
(2.301)
Nature_系列刊
(2.243)
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
(2.195)
Taylor & Francis Journals Auto-Holdings Collection
(2.114)
Taylor & Francis
(1.631)
SAGE Publications
(1.624)
Taylor & Francis Online
(1.497)
PBSC : Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection - Journals
(1.156)
Wiley Online Library Journals
(0)

16 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Neu hinzugefügt

... seit 30 Tagen
(1)
... seit 90 Tagen
(5)

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement

Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer review

Improving the Efficiency of Grant and Journal Peer Review: Registered Reports Funding

A Medical Record Peer-Review System to Evaluate Residents’ Clinical Competence: Criterion Validity Analysis

Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors

Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada

Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences

An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies

Big Data and Complex Data Analytics: Breaking Peer Review?

Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills

Assessing doctors’ competencies using multisource feedback: validating a Japanese version of the Sheffield Peer Review Assessment Tool (SPRAT)

On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective

Recommendations for Pathology Peer Review

The Evolution of the Journal Club: From Osler to Twitter

Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis

Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models

Stem cell clinics online: the direct-to-consumer portrayal of stem cell medicine

Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis

Characteristics of scholars who review for predatory and legitimate journals: linkage study of Cabells Scholarly Analytics and Publons data

Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery

Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey

Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques

Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting

Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine

How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern