UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 4.211

Sortiert nach

Effect of revealing authors' conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial

BMJ (Online), 2019-11, Vol.367, p.l5896

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Recommendations for including or reviewing patient reported outcome endpoints in grant applications

BMJ (Online), 2021-06, Vol.373, p.n1367

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BMJ open, 2020-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e035114-e035114

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels

BMJ open, 2015-09, Vol.5 (9), p.e009138-e009138

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Nature journal's plan to fast track paper for a fee prompts resignation from editorial board

BMJ (Online), 2015-03, Vol.350, p.h1761

Hawkes, Nigel

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions

BMJ (Online), 2017-07, Vol.358, p.j2998

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis

BMJ (Online), 2012-01, Vol.344 (7838), p.d7292

International edition, 2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial

BMJ (Online), 2011-11, Vol.343 (7833), p.d6783

International edition, 2011

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes

BMJ (Online), 2010-11, Vol.341, p.c6424

Groves, Trish

2010

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Is open peer review the fairest system? No

BMJ (Online), 2010-11, Vol.341, p.c6425

Khan, Karim

2010

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey

BMJ (Online), 2012-01, Vol.344 (7838), p.d7762

International edition, 2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Working 9 to 5, not the way to make an academic living: observational analysis of manuscript and peer review submissions over time

BMJ (Online), 2019-12, Vol.367, p.l6460

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience

Postgraduate medical journal, 2018-02, Vol.94 (1108), p.104

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

How to avoid being duped by predatory journals

BMJ (Online), 2024-03, Vol.384, p.q452

Amsen, Eva

2024

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Editors of neurology imaging journal resign to start new publication in protest at author fees

BMJ (Online), 2023-05, Vol.381, p.992

Dyer, Owen

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview

Postgraduate medical journal, 2017-08, Vol.93 (1102), p.499

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial

BMJ (Online), 1999-01, Vol.318 (7175), p.23

1999

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports

BMJ open, 2020-08, Vol.10 (8), p.e035058-e035058

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The influence of complexity: a bibliometric analysis of complexity science in healthcare

BMJ open, 2019-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e027308-e027308

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers

BMJ open, 2018-09, Vol.8 (9), p.e021753-e021753

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Should we welcome food industry funding of public health research?

BMJ (Online), 2016-04, Vol.353, p.i2161

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies

BMJ (Online), 2017-04, Vol.357, p.j1726

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis

BMJ open, 2016-07, Vol.6 (7), p.e011082-e011082

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Evaluation of stakeholder views on peer review of NIHR applications for funding: a qualitative study

BMJ open, 2018-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e022548-e022548

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

1 – 25 von 4.211

Suche als RSS-Feed

Aktive Filter

KollektionSpringerLink (Online service)

SpracheItalienisch

SpracheTürkisch

PublikationsformTexte

KollektionBMJ

ThemaGeneral & Internal Medicine

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(4.209)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(3.500)

Publikationsform

Artikel
(4.211)

Sprache

Englisch
(4.211)
Japanisch
(201)
Norwegisch
(14)

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

14 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Kollektion

EZB Free E-Journals
(3.585)
MEDLINE
(3.542)
Journals@Ovid Complete
(848)
Jstor Complete Legacy
(612)
Single Journals
(393)
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
(283)
SAGE Journals
(98)
Sociological Abstracts
(81)
BMJ Journals Archiv - DFG Nationallizenzen
(49)
Oxford University Press Journals Current
(47)
IngentaConnect Journals
(9)
Ingenta
(9)
Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
(0)

8 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Neu hinzugefügt

... seit 30 Tagen
(1)
... seit 90 Tagen
(28)

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

Effect of revealing authors' conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial

Recommendations for including or reviewing patient reported outcome endpoints in grant applications

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels

Nature journal's plan to fast track paper for a fee prompts resignation from editorial board

Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions

Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis

Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial

Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes

Is open peer review the fairest system? No

Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey

Working 9 to 5, not the way to make an academic living: observational analysis of manuscript and peer review submissions over time

Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience

How to avoid being duped by predatory journals

Editors of neurology imaging journal resign to start new publication in protest at author fees

Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial

Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports

The influence of complexity: a bibliometric analysis of complexity science in healthcare

Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers

Should we welcome food industry funding of public health research?

Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies

Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis

Evaluation of stakeholder views on peer review of NIHR applications for funding: a qualitative study

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern