UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 418

Sortiert nach

PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016-07, Vol.75, p.40-46

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2011-12, Vol.64 (12), p.1277-1282

2011

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

GRADE guidelines 17: Assessing the Risk of Bias Associated with Missing Participant Outcome Data in a body of evidence

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2017-07, Vol.87, p.14-22

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2015-09, Vol.68 (9), p.1076-1084

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2015-03, Vol.68 (3), p.257-265

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2014-09, Vol.67 (9), p.1001-1007

2014

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016, Vol.69, p.225-234

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016-02, Vol.70, p.61-67

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2009-09, Vol.62 (9), p.944-952

2009

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2014-12, Vol.67 (12), p.1291-1294

2014

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Significant discrepancies were found in pooled estimates of searching with Chinese indexes versus searching with English indexes

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016-02, Vol.70, p.246-253

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: A narrative review of case examples

Health policy (Amsterdam), 2011-10, Vol.102 (2), p.105-116

2011

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2017-07, Vol.87, p.4-13

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2014-04, Vol.67 (4), p.368-375

2014

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2012-09, Vol.65 (9), p.934-939

2012

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2017-05, Vol.85, p.50-58

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2011-12, Vol.64 (12), p.1303-1310

2011

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016-02, Vol.70, p.68-89

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2009-10, Vol.62 (10), p.1006-1012

2009

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2010-05, Vol.63 (5), p.502-512

2010

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019-12, Vol.116, p.98-105

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2015-06, Vol.68 (6), p.617-626

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: “STROBE-RDS” statement

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2015-12, Vol.68 (12), p.1463-1471

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2009-10, Vol.62 (10), p.1013-1020

2009

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2013-09, Vol.66 (9), p.982-993

2013

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

1 – 25 von 418

Suche als RSS-Feed

Aktive Filter

KollektionProject MUSE - Single Title Subscriptions

KollektionSingle Journals

ThemaFemale

KollektionElsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect (DFG Nationallizenzen)

KollektionIngenta

KollektionIngentaConnect Journals

ThemaInternal Medicine

ThemaScience & Technology

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(418)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(414)

Publikationsform

Artikel
(418)

Sprache

Englisch
(418)
Japanisch
(49)

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Life Sciences & Biomedicine
(418)
Humans
(348)
Health Care Sciences & Services
(301)
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
(295)
Review Literature As Topic
(266)
Epidemiology
(260)
Biological And Medical Sciences
(145)
Studies
(144)
Medical Sciences
(117)
Systematic Review
(114)
Public Health. Hygiene
(107)
Public Health. Hygiene-Occupational Medicine
(107)
Bias
(97)
Literature Reviews
(90)
Meta-Analysis
(90)
Research Design
(86)
Meta-Analysis As Topic
(83)
Miscellaneous
(77)

13 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement

GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias

GRADE guidelines 17: Assessing the Risk of Bias Associated with Missing Participant Outcome Data in a body of evidence

Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions

A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology

Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed

An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods

An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies

Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting

Significant discrepancies were found in pooled estimates of searching with Chinese indexes versus searching with English indexes

Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: A narrative review of case examples

The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence

Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview

Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement

The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar

GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness

Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program

Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review

Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: “STROBE-RDS” statement

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern