UB Paderborn / Katalog / Suche / in CDI

1 – 25 von 16.482

Sortiert nach

How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals

PloS one, 2015-08, Vol.10 (8), p.e0132557-e0132557

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Gender Disparity in Authorship of Peer-Reviewed Medical Publications

The American journal of the medical sciences, 2020-11, Vol.360 (5), p.511-516

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Publication performance of women compared to men in German cardiology

International journal of cardiology, 2015-02, Vol.181, p.267-269

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada

Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 2018-04, Vol.190 (16), p.E489

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?

Academic medicine, 2016-08, Vol.91 (8), p.1080-1088

2016

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Highlights of Studies in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Presented at the 2020 American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session

Current atherosclerosis reports, 2020-06, Vol.22 (8), p.32-32, Article 32

2020

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Longitudinal analysis of National Institutes of Health funding for academic thoracic surgeons

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2022-03, Vol.163 (3), p.872-879.e2

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Sex and Gender Reporting in Rehabilitation Research: A Commentary

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2023-08, Vol.104 (8), p.1356-1358

Colantonio, Angela

2023

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Which peer reviewers voluntarily reveal their identity to authors? Insights into the consequences of open-identities peer review

Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2021-10, Vol.288 (1961), p.20211399

Fox, Charles W

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Gender and Geographic Origin as Determinants of Manuscript Publication Outcomes: JBMR® Bibliometric Analysis from 2017 to 2019

Journal of bone and mineral research, 2022-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2420-2434

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

How do authors' perceptions of their papers compare with co-authors' perceptions and peer-review decisions?

PloS one, 2024, Vol.19 (4), p.e0300710-e0300710

2024

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Association of reviewer experience with discriminating human-written versus ChatGPT-written abstracts

International journal of gynecological cancer, 2024-05, Vol.34 (5), p.669-674

2024

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Woman authorship in pre-print versus peer-reviewed oral health-related publications: A two-year observational study

PloS one, 2021-12, Vol.16 (12), p.e0260791-e0260791

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques

Journal of women's health (Larchmont, N.Y. 2002), 2017-05, Vol.26 (5), p.560

2017

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

IGCS Presidential Address. Editorial

International journal of gynecological cancer, 2010-12, Vol.20 (9), p.1433-1433

Beller, Uziel

2010

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Relational spirituality and quality of life 2007 to 2017: an integrative research review

Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018-04, Vol.16 (1), p.75-75, Article 75

2018

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature

Supportive care in cancer, 2019-01, Vol.27 (1), p.97-108

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Research Review: Developmental origins of depression – a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 2021-09, Vol.62 (9), p.1050-1066

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The peer-review process: critical issues and challenges from an online survey

Epidemiologia e prevenzione, 2024-03, Vol.48 (2), p.149

2024

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Scientific Publishing

Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943), 2022-01, Vol.162 (1), p.59-62.e1

2022

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Can Sex and Seniority Predict the Quality of a Journal Reviewer's Manuscript Critique?

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021-10, Vol.111 (2), p.312-316

2021

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The role of immune infiltrates as prognostic biomarkers in patients with breast cancer

Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, 2019-10, Vol.68 (10), p.1671-1680

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

Research misconduct identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature

JAMA internal medicine, 2015-04, Vol.175 (4), p.567

Seife, Charles

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

A Quantitative Linguistic Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques From Investigators at One Institution

Academic medicine, 2015-01, Vol.90 (1), p.69-75

2015

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

The Role of International Databases in Understanding the Aetiology and Consequences of Differences/Disorders of Sex Development

International journal of molecular sciences, 2019-09, Vol.20 (18), p.4405

2019

Link zum Volltext

Verfügbarkeit prüfen

1 – 25 von 16.482

Suche als RSS-Feed

Aktive Filter

KollektionJSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing

SpracheSchwedisch

ThemaStudies

ThemaFemale

Suchergebnisse filtern

Filter anzeigen

Nur zeigen

Geprüft (Peer-Review)
(16.018)
Mit Volltextzugriff
(15.298)

Publikationsform

1 weiteren anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Sprache

10 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Erscheinungsjahr

n.n

Thema

Humans
(16.191)
Science & Technology
(15.098)
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
(13.006)
Male
(10.440)
Systematic Review
(7.203)
Adult
(5.618)
Middle Aged
(5.136)
Aged
(4.281)
Review
(3.829)
Medical Research
(3.775)
Medicine
(3.011)
Patients
(2.882)
Risk Factors
(2.678)
Adolescent
(2.541)
Pregnancy
(2.486)
Oncology
(2.445)
Health Aspects
(2.410)
Medicine, Research & Experimental
(2.189)
Research & Experimental Medicine
(2.186)

14 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Kollektion

MEDLINE
(16.398)
EZB Electronic Journals Library
(10.062)
Ingenta
(8.572)
IngentaConnect Journals
(6.001)
Journals@Ovid
(5.536)
SpringerLink (Online service)
(4.796)
SpringerLINK Contemporary (Konsortium Baden-Württemberg)
(2.166)
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
(1.740)
NUS Single-Journal Subscriptions
(1.677)
Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
(1.621)
Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
(1.366)
Wiley Online Library
(1.025)
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect (DFG Nationallizenzen)
(941)
BMJ Journals
(812)
EBSCOhost Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
(647)
SAGE Complete
(485)
Sociological Abstracts
(445)
Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
(439)
Taylor & Francis
(430)
Oxford journals
(385)
JSTOR
(0)

16 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Zeitschrift / Serie

Plos One
(2.074)
Bmj Open
(549)
Biomed Research International
(425)
Nutrients
(292)
Breast Cancer Research And Treatment
(287)
Medicine
(268)
Supportive Care In Cancer
(190)
International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health
(171)
Clinical Interventions In Aging
(164)
Advances In Therapy
(162)

5 weitere anzeigen...

Weniger anzeigen...

Neu hinzugefügt

... seit 90 Tagen
(209)
... seit 30 Tagen
(58)

Menü

Weitere Dienste

Einstellungen

How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals

Gender Disparity in Authorship of Peer-Reviewed Medical Publications

Publication performance of women compared to men in German cardiology

Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada

Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?

Highlights of Studies in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Presented at the 2020 American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session

Longitudinal analysis of National Institutes of Health funding for academic thoracic surgeons

Sex and Gender Reporting in Rehabilitation Research: A Commentary

Which peer reviewers voluntarily reveal their identity to authors? Insights into the consequences of open-identities peer review

Gender and Geographic Origin as Determinants of Manuscript Publication Outcomes: JBMR® Bibliometric Analysis from 2017 to 2019

How do authors' perceptions of their papers compare with co-authors' perceptions and peer-review decisions?

Association of reviewer experience with discriminating human-written versus ChatGPT-written abstracts

Woman authorship in pre-print versus peer-reviewed oral health-related publications: A two-year observational study

Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques

IGCS Presidential Address. Editorial

Relational spirituality and quality of life 2007 to 2017: an integrative research review

Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature

Research Review: Developmental origins of depression – a systematic review and meta‐analysis

The peer-review process: critical issues and challenges from an online survey

Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Scientific Publishing

Can Sex and Seniority Predict the Quality of a Journal Reviewer's Manuscript Critique?

The role of immune infiltrates as prognostic biomarkers in patients with breast cancer

Research misconduct identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature

A Quantitative Linguistic Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques From Investigators at One Institution

The Role of International Databases in Understanding the Aetiology and Consequences of Differences/Disorders of Sex Development

Aktive Filter

Suchergebnisse filtern