Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• ter Borg, Sovianne, MSc
• de Groot, Lisette C.P.G.M., PhD
• Mijnarends, Donja M., MSc
• de Vries, Jeanne H.M., PhD
• Verlaan, Sjors, MSc
• Meijboom, Saskia
• Luiking, Yvette C., PhD
• Schols, Jos M.G.A., PhD

Titel

Differences in Nutrient Intake and Biochemical Nutrient Status Between Sarcopenic and Nonsarcopenic Older Adults—Results From the Maastricht Sarcopenia Study

Ist Teil von

• Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2016-05, Vol.17 (5), p.393-401

Ort / Verlag

United States: Elsevier Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2016

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract Background There is growing evidence of a relationship between nutrients and muscle mass, strength, and physical performance. Although nutrition is seen as an important pillar of treating sarcopenia, data on the nutritional intake of sarcopenic older adults are limited. Objective To investigate potential nutritional gaps in the sarcopenic population, the present study compared nutrient intake and biochemical nutrient status between sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic older adults. Design The Maastricht Sarcopenia Study included 227 community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years) from Maastricht, 53 of whom were sarcopenic based on the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People algorithm. Habitual dietary intake was assessed with a food frequency questionnaire and data on dietary supplement use were collected. In addition, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, magnesium and α-tocopherol/cholesterol, plasma homocysteine and red blood cell n-3, and n-6 fatty acids profiles were assessed. Nutrient intake and biochemical nutrient status of the sarcopenic groups were compared with those of the nonsarcopenic groups. The robustness of these results was tested with a multiple regression analysis, taking into account between-group differences in characteristics. Results Sarcopenic older adults had a 10%–18% lower intake of 5 nutrients (n-3 fatty acids, vitamin B6 , folic acid, vitamin E, magnesium) compared with nonsarcopenic older adults ( P  < .05). When taking into account dietary supplement intake, a 19% difference remained for n-3 fatty acids intake ( P  = .005). For the 2 biochemical status markers, linoleic acid and homocysteine, a 7% and 27% difference was observed, respectively ( P  < .05). The higher homocysteine level confirmed the observed lower vitamin B intake in the sarcopenic group. Observed differences in eicosapentaenoic acid and 25-hydroxyvitamin D between the groups were related to differences in age and living situation. Conclusions Sarcopenic older adults differed in certain nutritional intakes and biochemical nutrient status compared with nonsarcopenic older adults. Dietary supplement intake reduced the gap for some of these nutrients. Targeted nutritional intervention may therefore improve the nutritional intake and biochemical status of sarcopenic older adults.