Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Gonzalez, Mariaelena
• Green, Lawrence W
• Glantz, Stanton A

Titel

Through tobacco industry eyes: civil society and the FCTC process from Philip Morris and British American Tobacco's perspectives

Ist Teil von

• Tobacco control, 2012-07, Vol.21 (4), p.e1-e1

Ort / Verlag

England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2012

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

BMJ Journals Archiv - DFG Nationallizenzen

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• ObjectiveTo analyse the models Philip Morris (PM) and British American Tobacco (BAT) used internally to understand tobacco control non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and their relationship to the global tobacco control policy-making process that resulted in the Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (FCTC).MethodsAnalysis of internal tobacco industry documents in the Legacy Tobacco Document Library.ResultsPM contracted with Mongoven, Biscoe, and Duchin, Inc. (MBD, a consulting firm specialising in NGO surveillance) as advisors. MBD argued that because NGOs are increasingly linked to epistemic communities, NGOs could insert themselves into the global policy-making process and influence the discourse surrounding the treaty-making process. MBD advised PM to insert itself into the policy-making process, mimicking NGO behaviour. BAT's Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (CORA) department argued that global regulation emerged from the perception (by NGOs and governments) that the industry could not regulate itself, leading to BAT advocating social alignment and self-regulation to minimise the impact of the FCTC. Most efforts to block or redirect the FCTC failed.ConclusionsPM and BAT articulated a global policy-making environment in which NGOs are key, non-state stakeholders, and as a result, internationalised some of their previous national-level strategies. After both companies failed to prevent the FCTC, their strategies began to align. Multinational corporations have continued to successfully employ some of the strategies outlined in this paper at the local and national level while being formally excluded from ongoing FCTC negotiations at the global level.