Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Risky Income or Lumpy Investments? Evidence on Two Theories of Underspecialization
Ist Teil von
Economic development and cultural change, 2018-07, Vol.66 (4), p.629-671
Ort / Verlag
Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
Erscheinungsjahr
2018
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Why do the poor have so many economic activities? According to one theory, the poor do not specialize because relying on one income source is risky. I test the theory by measuring the response of Thai rice farmers to conditional volatility in the international rice price. Households expecting a harvest take on one extra activity when the volatility rises by 21%. I confirm that the decrease in specialization costs households foregone revenue. I find no evidence to back a second theory in which households underspecialize because they cannot afford lumpy business investments.